Feedipedia
Animal feed resources information system
Feedipedia
Feedipedia

Did you find the information you were looking for? Is it valuable to you? Feedipedia is encountering funding shortage. We need your help to keep providing reference-based feeding recommendations for your animals.
Would you consider donating? If yes, please click on the button Donate.

Any amount is the welcome. Even one cent is helpful to us!

Wheat shorts, wheat middlings and feed flour

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This datasheet is pending revision and updating; its contents are currently derived from FAO's Animal Feed Resources Information System (1991-2002) and from Bo Göhl's Tropical Feeds (1976-1982).

Datasheet

Description
Click on the "Nutritional aspects" tab for recommendations for ruminants, pigs, poultry, rabbits, horses, fish and crustaceans
Common names 

Wheat shorts, wheat middlings, feed flour

Description 

Texte à prendre en compte: Blasi, et al., Wheat Middlings Composition, Feeding Value, and Storage Guidelines, Kansas State University, August 1998

Shorts is a mixture of fine bran and feed flour in proportions that vary according to the type (extraction rate) of table flour the mill produces.
Middlings is mixture of shorts and germ and is the most common by-product of flour mills. If the proportion of ingredients is retained, middlings are often called mill-run or wheat pollard.
Feed flour is the residue of the endosperm from the production of fine white table flour with low extraction (60-65%). It contains mainly the starchy portion of the endosperm and also some of the more nutritious aleurone layer. Seldom used alone, it is mixed with other offals to give wheat shorts and middlings.

Nutritional aspects
Nutritional attributes 

Both shorts and middlings can be fed to all classes of livestock and are used in the same way.

Ruminants 

Middlings are common - often up to 40% - in concentrates for cattle. Owing to their bulkiness it is difficult to formulate a satisfactory ration based on middlings for growing and fattening pigs. It has sometimes been found economical to include up to 45% middlings, but a more normal level of inclusion is 15-25%.

Poultry 

Ancien texte Göhl

Some middlings can be advantageously included in feed for layers, but practical considerations usually limit the content to less than 10%. Wheat middlings are reported to contain a factor that reduces the incidence and severity of gizzard erosion. Steam pelleting of wheat middlings increases their naturally low metabolizable energy and poor protein utilization in poultry diets as much as 30% and 17%, respectively, by rupturing the aleurone cells and exposing the content of the cells to attack by digestive enzymes (Göhl, 1982).

Laying hens

(Bai Yisheng et al., 1992)

texte ML

Variability in composition and nutritive value of wheat products: shorts, middlings and wheat flour can be important, depending on milling process used. Wheat by- products contain less starch and more proteins and crude fiber than wheat grain, as a consequence metabolisable energy is reduced (Slominski et al., 2004). Higher amino acid digestibility values are mentioned in layer than in broilers (Huang et al., 2007)
When those products are introduced in poultry diets up to high levels, no great detrimental effects are observed (Abudabos, 2011; Ahmadi et al., 2010; Bai Yisheng et al., 1992, Stapleton et al., 1980). Some attempts have been made to improve their value by adding exogenous enzymes such as xylanase. Some positive effects are observed (Abudabos, 2011, Boros et al., 2004).
As a consequence, incorporation rates of those products can be optimized by least cost programming systems according to their nutritional value and their price. The main limiting factor is the maximum crude fiber content of the complete diets. Bulk density and dustiness of those products can also limit the incorporation rates since they may reduce feed intake when the diets are not pelleted.
Moreover, wheat shorts can also be used for molting of laying hens (Attia et al., 1994).

Fish 

The fibre content of wheat offals is variable and may limit their use to vegetarian and omnivorous fish. General recommended rates for middlings are 10-20 % (Hertrampf et al., 2000). Wheat middlings have been tested and used in numerous fish species.

Carps

Common carps (Cyprinus carpio L.) fed wheat middlings at 3 % body weight 3 times daily had better growth, feed conversion, DM in carcass, protein and energy retention than carps fed wheat bran and rice bran (the latter extruded or not) but performance were lower than for carps fed biscuit wastes (Shalaby et al., 1989)

Other fish species

In South American characids black pacu (tambaqui) Colossoma macropomum and red pacu Piaractus brachypomus, cassava root, plantain fruit and peach-palm fruit (Bactris gasipaes) gave better growth performance than wheat bran and wheat middlings in diets containing 30 % of the test ingredient (Lochmann et al., 2009).

Nutritional tables
Tables of chemical composition and nutritional value 

Avg: average or predicted value; SD: standard deviation; Min: minimum value; Max: maximum value; Nb: number of values (samples) used

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This datasheet is pending revision and updating; its contents are currently derived from FAO's Animal Feed Resources Information System (1991-2002) and from Bo Göhl's Tropical Feeds (1976-1982).

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 87.7 1.1 85.6 91.5 1110
Crude protein % DM 14.4 2.1 9.8 19.0 1092
Crude fibre % DM 1.5 0.8 0.3 3.0 496
NDF % DM 9.9 3.8 5.0 15.8 7 *
ADF % DM 2.2 1.0 0.4 3.2 6 *
Lignin % DM 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.8 10 *
Ether extract % DM 2.5 0.7 1.1 3.9 268
Ash % DM 1.5 0.5 0.6 2.6 395
Starch (polarimetry) % DM 69.9 6.1 55.5 82.2 958
Total sugars % DM 3.6 1.2 1.4 5.1 9
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 18.9 1.0 16.2 20.8 15 *
 
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 1.2 0.4 0.6 2.1 9
Phosphorus g/kg DM 4.0 1.6 0.9 5.8 9 *
Potassium g/kg DM 5.7 *
Sodium g/kg DM 0.2 1
Iron mg/kg DM 16 15 16 2
 
Amino acids Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Alanine % protein 3.8 0.4 3.2 4.5 8
Arginine % protein 5.5 0.8 4.0 6.9 8
Aspartic acid % protein 5.6 0.7 4.5 6.6 8
Cystine % protein 2.1 0.1 1.8 2.3 9
Glutamic acid % protein 24.9 3.7 17.4 27.8 8
Glycine % protein 4.2 0.3 3.7 4.7 8
Histidine % protein 2.4 0.2 2.2 2.7 7
Isoleucine % protein 3.4 0.3 3.0 3.8 8
Leucine % protein 6.3 0.4 5.6 6.6 8
Lysine % protein 3.1 0.5 1.9 3.9 13
Methionine % protein 1.7 0.1 1.4 1.9 10
Phenylalanine % protein 4.2 0.3 3.7 4.4 8
Proline % protein 8.8 8.3 9.4 2
Serine % protein 4.4 0.2 4.1 4.7 8
Threonine % protein 3.0 0.2 2.8 3.4 10
Tryptophan % protein 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.2 5
Tyrosine % protein 2.6 1
Valine % protein 4.4 0.3 3.8 4.7 8
 
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 90.4 *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 88.2 *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 16.6 *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 13.9 *
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 72.9 *
 
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 91.1 *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 17.2 *
Nitrogen digestibility, growing pig % 86.1 *
 
Poultry nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
AMEn cockerel MJ/kg DM 14.8 *
AMEn broiler MJ/kg DM 14.2 *
 
Rabbit nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, rabbit % 84.3 *
DE rabbit MJ/kg DM 15.9 *
MEn rabbit MJ/kg DM 15.2 *
Nitrogen digestibility, rabbit % 84.0 *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Adeola, 2003; AFZ, 2011; De Silva et al., 1990; Friesecke, 1970; Jondreville et al., 2000; Krishna, 1985; Maertens et al., 1985; Mariscal Landin, 1992; Noblet et al., 2000; Rajaguru et al., 1985

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:45:20

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 87.9 1.1 84.7 91.2 5186
Crude protein % DM 17.7 1.2 13.5 21.3 5145
Crude fibre % DM 7.5 1.5 2.9 12.1 4058
NDF % DM 33.7 4.7 25.3 44.5 92 *
ADF % DM 9.8 1.6 7.4 13.6 90 *
Lignin % DM 2.8 0.6 1.6 4.1 125 *
Ether extract % DM 4.3 0.7 2.2 5.9 2387
Ash % DM 4.3 0.6 2.4 6.2 2740
Starch (polarimetry) % DM 32.3 6.3 20.1 59.2 4808
Total sugars % DM 8.5 1.8 4.3 11.4 62
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 19.2 0.2 18.6 19.4 29 *
 
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 1.3 0.3 0.8 2.4 174
Phosphorus g/kg DM 8.9 1.3 6.7 12.4 184 *
Potassium g/kg DM 11.3 1.3 10.0 15.1 41 *
Sodium g/kg DM 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 55
Magnesium g/kg DM 4.2 1.7 2.2 9.6 40
Manganese mg/kg DM 98 27 58 150 15
Zinc mg/kg DM 104 22 72 143 15
Copper mg/kg DM 15 2 11 17 13
Iron mg/kg DM 207 36 157 257 5
 
Amino acids Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Alanine % protein 4.4 0.4 3.4 4.8 23
Arginine % protein 6.3 0.4 5.2 6.9 26
Aspartic acid % protein 6.5 0.3 5.7 7.1 24
Cystine % protein 2.0 0.2 1.7 2.3 20
Glutamic acid % protein 19.9 1.6 17.5 22.7 23
Glycine % protein 4.8 0.3 4.2 5.2 25
Histidine % protein 2.6 0.2 2.2 3.0 22
Isoleucine % protein 3.2 0.2 2.9 3.5 26
Leucine % protein 6.0 0.2 5.6 6.6 26
Lysine % protein 4.0 0.3 3.3 4.6 35
Methionine % protein 1.6 0.2 1.3 1.9 28
Phenylalanine % protein 3.9 0.2 3.6 4.3 26
Proline % protein 6.3 0.8 4.5 8.2 17
Serine % protein 4.2 0.2 3.9 4.6 23
Threonine % protein 3.2 0.2 2.9 3.5 26
Tryptophan % protein 1.3 0.2 1.1 2.0 15
Tyrosine % protein 2.6 0.3 2.2 3.0 15
Valine % protein 4.5 0.2 4.0 4.9 23
 
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 78.9 3.8 68.4 85.9 13 *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 77.1 3.4 72.2 84.0 11 *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 14.8 0.4 13.9 14.9 4 *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 12.1 0.8 11.2 14.3 11 *
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 70.4 1.5 70.4 77.0 6 *
a (N) % 31.9 1
b (N) % 56.5 1
c (N) h-1 0.171 1
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=4%) % 78 *
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=6%) % 74 8 68 87 4 *
 
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 68.2 7.2 56.4 78.0 6 *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 13.1 1.5 10.5 14.9 6 *
MEn growing pig MJ/kg DM 13.2 1.1 12.4 14.4 3
Nitrogen digestibility, growing pig % 71.8 4.4 69.0 79.4 4 *
 
Poultry nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
AMEn cockerel MJ/kg DM 10.5 1.7 6.1 11.9 9 *
AMEn broiler MJ/kg DM 10.1 *
 
Rabbit nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, rabbit % 68.8 *
DE rabbit MJ/kg DM 13.2 12.3 14.5 2 *
MEn rabbit MJ/kg DM 12.4 *
Nitrogen digestibility, rabbit % 77.2 74.7 77.2 2 *
 
Fish nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
DE salmonids MJ/kg DM 8.4 7.0 9.6 2 *
Energy digestibility, salmonids % 43.9 42.4 45.3 2
Nitrogen digestibility, salmonids % 88.9 85.7 92.0 2

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

ADAS, 1988; ADAS, 1989; AFZ, 2011; Anderson et al., 1991; Aufrère et al., 1991; Bach Knudsen, 1997; Batajoo et al., 1998; Castaing et al., 1995; CIRAD, 1991; Clark et al., 1997; Cowan et al., 1998; De Boever et al., 1994; Dei et al., 2008; Devendra et al., 1970; Dewar, 1967; Fernandez Carmona et al., 1996; Getachew et al., 2004; Guillaume, 1978; Hajen et al., 1993; Han et al., 1976; Hanczakowski et al., 1979; Hepburn et al., 1960; Jondreville et al., 2000; Jongbloed et al., 1990; Kendall et al., 1982; Kiiskinen, 1992; Lechevestrier, 1992; Leeson et al., 1974; Lekule et al., 1990; Macgregor et al., 1978; Maertens et al., 1985; Mariscal Landin, 1992; Masoero et al., 1994; May et al., 1971; McNab et al., 1988; Morgan et al., 1975; Morse et al., 1992; Nengas et al., 1995; Noblet et al., 2000; Oliveira et al., 2007; Petit, 1992; Pozy et al., 1996; Qiao ShiYan et al., 2004; Rogerson, 1956; San Juan et al., 1993; Sauer et al., 1989; Shi et al., 1993; Smolders et al., 1990; Storey et al., 1982; Swanek et al., 2001; Tamminga et al., 1990; Ulvesli et al., 1975; Wainman et al., 1979

Last updated on 28/11/2012 22:36:45

References
References 
Datasheet citation 

DATASHEET UNDER CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT QUOTE. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/727 Last updated on December 4, 2025, 14:25

Image credits