Feedipedia
Animal feed resources information system
Feedipedia
Feedipedia

Did you find the information you were looking for? Is it valuable to you? Feedipedia is encountering funding shortage. We need your help to keep providing reference-based feeding recommendations for your animals.
Would you consider donating? If yes, please click on the button Donate.

Any amount is the welcome. Even one cent is helpful to us!

Sudan grass (Sorghum × drummondii)

Datasheet

Description
Click on the "Nutritional aspects" tab for recommendations for ruminants, pigs, poultry, rabbits, horses, fish and crustaceans
Common names 

Sudan grass, sudangrass, chicken corn, shattercane, sordan, sorghum sudangrass [English]; sorgho du Soudan, sorgho menu [French]; pasto Sudán, hierba del Sudán [Spanish]; Sudan otu [Azerbaijani]; Sudangras [German]; Sorgo sudańskie [Polish]; batag [Tagalog]; Սուդանի խոտ [Armenian]; Суданка [Bulgarian]; スーダングラス [Japanese]; Суданская трава [Russian]

Synonyms 

Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. drummondii (Steud.) de Wet (FAO, 2009)

Related feed(s) 
Description 

Sudan grass (Sorghum × drummondii (Steud.) Millsp. & Chas) is a warm-season annual grass used mainly as ruminant forage. It has slender culms (3-9 mm thick), generally thinner than those of forage sorghum, and can reach 2-3 m under favourable conditions. Leaves are numerous, light green and elongated (long (4-15 cm), and the inflorescence is a loose panicle with short racemes and paired spikelets (6-7 mm long). The species is valued for rapid summer growth, good regrowth after cutting or grazing, and its ability to provide forage during periods when cool-season pastures have reduced growth (Hacker, 1992).

The terminology used in the literature requires care. Sudan grass, also called sudangrass, refers here to Sorghum × drummondii, also treated as Sorghum sudanense or Sorghum bicolor subsp. drummondii. Many recent papers, however, deal with sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, which are commercial hybrids between sorghum and Sudan grass. These hybrids are used in similar ways to Sudan grass, but they may differ in yield, stem thickness, digestibility, brown-midrib status and cyanogenic potential. Results obtained with sorghum-sudangrass hybrids should therefore not be presented as if they automatically applied to pure Sudan grass (Hacker, 1992; Cruz et al., 2025).

Distribution 

Sudan grass is native to north-eastern Africa, particularly southern Egypt and Sudan, and was introduced into other regions, including the USA and Russia, in the early twentieth century. It is now grown in tropical, subtropical and warm-temperate areas as a summer annual forage. It is used in parts of Africa, Asia, the Americas, southern Europe and Australia, and it is also used as a parent of sorghum-sudangrass hybrids (Duke, 1983; Hacker, 1992).

The crop is best adapted to warm conditions with relatively dry air and moderate rainfall. It grows on a wide range of soils, including heavy clay and sandy soils, and has some tolerance of salinity and alkalinity. It is drought resistant but does not tolerate waterlogging, prolonged cold or frost. It is less suited to humid tropical conditions than to warm, dry growing seasons (Hacker, 1992). Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids are valuable in summer feed-gap and water-limited systems, although in cooler temperate environments C3 cereals such as oat or barley may outyield them (Omokanye et al., 2021; Van Die et al., 2022).

Forage management 

Average yields are 80 t/ha (fresh), 12-15 t/ha (dry matter) and 40-45 t/ha (silage). It is possible to have 4 crops during a season (FAO, 2009; Duke, 1983).

Sudan grass can be grazed, cut and carried, made into hay, or ensiled. Sorghum-sudangrass hybrids are managed in similar ways, though they may be coarser and may be less easy to dry than pure Sudan grass. The forage should be managed to balance biomass production, forage quality and safety. As the crop matures, dry matter yield increases but the proportion of stem rises, crude protein and digestibility decline, and grazing performance may decrease (Parish et al., 2013; Simili et al., 2013; Beck et al., 2013).

Nitrogen fertilisation can increase yield and crude protein concentration, but excessive N increases the risk of nitrate accumulation. In Egypt, Sudan grass yield increased up to an intermediate N rate and then declined at the highest rate, while nitrate and nitrite concentrations increased with N supply (Abo-Zeid et al., 2017). In sorghum-sudangrass baleage, high N rates increased herbage mass and crude protein but also increased nitrate to levels that remained problematic even after ensiling (Bustabad et al., 2025). Moderate fertilisation and forage testing are therefore preferable to maximising N inputs.

For grazing, young plants and young regrowth should be avoided because of hydrocyanic acid risk. In Brazil, a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid had high leaf HCN concentrations during the first weeks of growth, and the authors recommended grazing only after five weeks of growth or when plants were above 80 cm (Simili et al., 2013). Frost, drought and plant injury also increase cyanogenic risk, so grazing should be delayed after frost or severe stress. Pearl millet or other non-cyanogenic summer annuals may be preferable when autumn grazing is expected to continue after frost (Lauriault et al., 2021).

Sudan grass hay can be useful where fast drying is possible. In a Brazilian comparison of chopped tropical grass hays, Sudan grass had an intermediate hay yield but higher crude protein than elephant grass and forage sorghum hays, and the highest estimated total digestible nutrients among the tested hays (Aguiar et al., 2006b). However, fibre concentration remained high, and haymaking losses depend on drying conditions and handling.

Silage and baleage are important preservation methods, particularly when drying conditions are poor. Fresh Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass can have high moisture at harvest, which may lead to poor fermentation. Wilting, good chop length, high packing density, adequate storage temperature, and use of suitable additives can improve fermentation. In Sudan grass silage, wilting combined with molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum gave the best fermentation quality and improved in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics (Wan et al., 2021). In sorghum-sudangrass hybrid silages, dry absorbent materials, molasses, lactic acid bacteria or other microbial additives improved fermentation quality, aerobic stability, in vitro digestibility or nitrate degradation in several studies (Han et al., 2015; Liang et al., 2018; Paradhipta et al., 2019; Bai et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2022).

Mixtures with legumes may improve the protein value of Sudan grass forage or silage. Hungarian vetch increased dry matter and crude protein degradability of Sudan grass silage, with 25-50% vetch suggested as suitable under the conditions of the study (Demirel et al., 2003). However, mixed stands are not automatically superior: performance depends on establishment, species balance, N supply and local economics (Mercier, 2021).

Environmental impact 

Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids are C4 annual forages that can provide forage during hot, dry periods and help fill summer feed gaps. Their drought tolerance and rapid growth make them useful in systems where perennial cool-season pastures lose productivity in midsummer, and in regions where water-limited forage production is a recurrent constraint (Hacker, 1992; Van Die et al., 2022). Prussic-acid-free sorghum-sudangrass hybrids may also improve the safety of grazing systems in semi-arid areas, although they remain specific cultivars rather than a general property of the crop (Aviles et al., 2026a).

The environmental value of Sudan grass-based systems depends on management. High N fertilisation can increase forage production and crude protein, but it also increases nitrate accumulation and may reduce feed safety (Abo-Zeid et al., 2017; Bustabad et al., 2025). Ensiling may reduce nitrate concentration, but nitrate degradation during sorghum-sudangrass ensiling can be associated with nitrous oxide release, particularly when some microbial additives are used (Zhao et al., 2022). Sudan grass should therefore be considered a drought-adapted forage option rather than an inherently low-impact feed.

Nutritional aspects
Nutritional attributes 

Sudan grass is a medium-protein, high-fibre forage. Its composition varies strongly with cultivar, fertilisation, water supply, stage of growth and preservation method. Fresh forage commonly has moderate crude protein (CP) and high NDF. As plants mature, CP and digestibility decrease and fibre concentration increases; this decline in quality was associated with lower calf gains in Sudan grass pastures later in the grazing season (Parish et al., 2013).

Sudan grass hay is generally a roughage of moderate quality. In Brazilian chopped hays, Sudan grass hay contained 8.8% CP, 69.2% NDF, 46.4% ADF on a dry matter (DM) basis (Aguiar et al., 2006b).

Brown-midrib (BMR) Sudan grass or sorghum-sudangrass hybrids tend to have improved fibre utilisation compared with conventional types. BMR sorghum-sudangrass hybrids had higher DM and NDF disappearance and greater effective degradability than conventional hybrids in an in situ study (Silva et al., 2018). In Sudan grass, BMR material had lower fibre concentration and higher calculated total digestible nutrients than non-BMR material, particularly at more advanced maturity (Beck et al., 2013). These advantages are useful mainly when forage quality is limiting and should not remove the need to manage cyanogenic or nitrate risks.

Sorghum-sudangrass hybrid pastures are often lower in crude protein than cool-season perennial pastures but may have similar fibre digestibility. In an organic dairy grazing system in Minnesota, warm-season annual pastures including BMR sorghum-sudangrass produced more summer forage than cool-season pastures; crude protein was lower, whereas NDF, ADF and total-tract NDF digestibility were similar (Ritz et al., 2020). In continuous culture, BMR sorghum-sudangrass had ruminal fermentation characteristics broadly comparable with cool-season pasture forage (Ruh et al., 2018).

Silage quality is variable and depends heavily on moisture and fermentation management. Pure high-moisture sorghum-sudangrass silage may ferment poorly unless wilted or supplemented with dry materials or additives (Liang et al., 2018). In Sudan grass, wilting and the combination of molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum improved silage quality and in vitro digestibility (Wan et al., 2021). Other studies on sorghum-sudangrass hybrid silage reported improved fermentation, aerobic stability or in vitro digestibility with appropriate inoculants or additives (Han et al., 2015; Paradhipta et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2022).

Sudan grass differs from legumes in protein fractions. In Serbia, Sudan grass had lower rumen degradable protein values and more protein in slowly or poorly degradable fractions than alfalfa or red clover. Ensiling Sudan grass with legumes reduced protein degradability compared with pure legume silages, which may be useful where excessively degradable forage protein limits nitrogen-use efficiency (Stojanovi̇ć et al., 2020).

Potential constraints 

The main constraints of Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids are hydrocyanic acid (prussic acid) poisoning and nitrate accumulation. Sudan grass contains dhurrin, a cyanogenic glycoside that can release hydrocyanic acid after plant tissue is damaged. Risk is greatest in young plants, young regrowth, drought-stressed plants, frost-damaged plants, and forage subjected to trampling, wilting or other injury. Cultivar, growth stage and sowing season also influence dhurrin concentration (Hacker, 1992; Macolino et al., 2024). In order to prevent poisoning, it is recommended to wilt Sudan grass and to avoid adding too much fertilizer. Supplementing grazing cattle with sulphur blocks can improve weight gain and reduce prussic acid poisoning (FAO, 2009). 

Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids should be used cautiously in horses because they have been associated with a specific neurological and urinary syndrome. Horses grazing Sudan grass or hybrid sorghums have shown posterior ataxia, urinary incontinence, cystitis and lesions of the lower spinal cord, and grazing during early pregnancy has been associated with abortion or severe fetal musculoskeletal deformities (Van Kampen, 1970).

Drought stress is a major risk factor. In China, drought increased HCN accumulation in Sudan grass, forage sorghum and sweet sorghum. HCN concentration varied with genotype and growth stage, generally declining from jointing to filling before increasing again towards ripening in several genotypes (Shehab et al., 2020). In Brazil, HCN concentration in a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid was high during early growth and fell sharply by the fifth week; grazing was recommended only after five weeks or when the crop was taller than 80 cm (Simili et al., 2013).

Frost management is particularly important for autumn grazing. Sorghum-sudangrass grazing may have to stop after frost because of hydrocyanic acid risk, whereas pearl millet can be grazed after frost and may extend the grazing period (Lauriault et al., 2021). Prussic-acid-free sorghum-sudangrass hybrids and dhurrin-free cultivars may reduce this hazard, but the available evidence is still cultivar-specific and should not be generalised to ordinary Sudan grass or conventional hybrids (Aviles et al., 2026; Rehder et al., 2025).

Nitrate accumulation is favoured by high N fertilisation, drought, low light, cold stress and rapid regrowth. In Egypt, nitrate and nitrite concentrations increased with N fertilisation in Sudan grass (Abo-Zeid et al., 2017). In sorghum-sudangrass baleage, high N fertilisation produced nitrate concentrations above recommended feeding thresholds; ensiling reduced nitrate but did not consistently make unsafe forage safe (Bustabad et al., 2025). A large US dataset on annual forages showed that fresh annual grasses, including sorghum/sudangrass types, were more likely than dry annual grasses to exceed nitrate-risk thresholds, and that producers did not always test annual forages for nitrate (Lenz et al., 2019).

Ensiling can reduce nitrate concentration, but it should not be relied upon as the only safety measure. Laboratory studies showed nitrate degradation during sorghum-sudangrass ensiling, especially with good fermentation management or selected microbial additives, but environmental side effects such as nitrous oxide release may occur (Bai et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2022). Forage testing remains necessary when Sudan grass or sorghum-sudangrass has grown under drought, frost, high N fertilisation or other stress conditions. Horse pasture work also reported high nitrate-nitrogen concentrations and inverted calcium-to-phosphorus ratios in warm-season annual grasses, so Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass pastures should be analysed for nitrate and minerals before grazing, especially after stress or nitrogen fertilisation (DeBoer et al., 2017; Martinson, 2024).

Other practical constraints are high fibre concentration at advanced maturity, low crude protein under drought or late harvest, high moisture at ensiling, and possible aerobic deterioration of silage after opening. Wilting, appropriate chop length, rapid exclusion of air, use of suitable silage additives and careful feed-out management can reduce these risks (Han et al., 2015; Liang et al., 2018; Wan et al., 2021).

Ruminants 

Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids are used by ruminants as pasture, fresh forage, hay, silage and baleage. They are valuable warm-season annual forages in systems where summer growth of cool-season pastures is limited, or where a drought-tolerant forage is required. However, results obtained with sorghum-sudangrass hybrids should not be presented as applying automatically to Sudan grass sensu stricto, as many recent cultivars are agronomic hybrids between forage sorghum and Sudan grass. In all cases, grazing and harvesting management must account for the risks of hydrocyanic acid and nitrate accumulation, especially in young regrowth, drought-stressed forage, heavily fertilised crops and forage affected by frost (Hacker, 1992; Simili et al., 2013; Lauriault et al., 2021; Shehab et al., 2020).

The feeding value of Sudan grass-type forages depends strongly on cultivar, brown midrib (BMR) status, stage of maturity, conservation method and associated species. Advancing maturity generally increases dry matter and fibre concentration and decreases crude protein and calculated energy values, while BMR traits tend to improve fibre degradability and energy value, particularly when forage is harvested later than the vegetative stage (Beck et al., 2013; Silva et al., 2018). Legume associations can improve crude protein supply and degradability, but their value depends on successful establishment and on maintaining acceptable silage fermentation (Demirel et al., 2003; Stojanovi̇ć et al., 2020).

Cattle

Fresh forage and grazing

Sudan grass pasture can support cattle production, but animal performance is closely related to forage maturity and pasture structure. In Mississippi, stocker calves grazing three sudangrass cultivars had good gains during the first part of the summer grazing season, but gains declined as the crop matured, in parallel with lower digestibility and crude protein and higher fibre concentrations (Parish et al., 2013). In Brazil, cull cows grazing Sudan grass had grazing, rumination and displacement patterns broadly comparable to cows grazing pearl millet, though behaviour changed as the pasture matured and the leaf:stem ratio declined (Pacheco et al., 2013).

Sudan grass-type forages can also be used in mixed or intercropped summer grazing systems. In Wisconsin, BMR sudangrass intercropped with Kura clover had lower nutritive value than corn intercropped with Kura clover, but produced more harvested forage and greater steer gain per hectare because of its regrowth capacity after grazing (Nieman et al., 2020). In Kentucky, increasing the complexity of summer annual mixtures did not necessarily improve forage yield, nutritive value or beef-calf performance, largely because complex mixtures were dominated by grasses and legumes established poorly (Mercier, 2021).

Sorghum-sudangrass hybrids are often used to fill summer forage gaps in beef and dairy grazing systems. In organic dairy grazing systems in Minnesota, adding warm-season annual pastures including BMR sorghum-sudangrass increased summer forage yield while maintaining NDF digestibility similar to that of cool-season pastures, although crude protein was lower (Ritz et al., 2020). In a Canadian organic grass-fed system, sorghum-sudangrass produced high mid-summer biomass, but low crude protein and drought-related prussic-acid risk limited its practical grazing value (Van Die et al., 2022).

In semi-arid or frost-prone systems, the usefulness of sorghum-sudangrass hybrids depends on safety management. In New Mexico, sorghum-sudangrass and pearl millet had similar forage yields, but pearl millet extended autumn grazing because sorghum-sudangrass had to be withdrawn after frost owing to hydrocyanic acid risk (Lauriault et al., 2021). Conversely, a prussic-acid-free sorghum-sudangrass hybrid gave higher cattle gains than pearl millet under irrigated semi-arid conditions, with nitrate and prussic-acid concentrations below the stated toxicity thresholds (Aviles et al., 2026). These contrasting results indicate that non-cyanogenic cultivars may improve grazing flexibility, but they do not remove the need to monitor nitrate risk and forage maturity.

Swath grazing can be used as a low-input winter feeding strategy with sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, but individual liveweight gain may be modest. In Nebraska, allocating swathed sorghum-sudangrass twice weekly rather than once weekly increased carrying capacity but did not affect average daily gain or forage utilisation in growing steers (Aquino et al., 2024).

Hay, silage and baleage

Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids can be conserved as hay, silage or baleage, but their value depends on harvest stage, moisture and feed-out losses. Sudan grass hay has traditionally been used as a roughage source in high-concentrate beef diets. In feedlot steers fed steam-flaked maize-based finishing diets, reducing sudangrass hay from 16 to 8% of diet dry matter improved growth rate and feed efficiency, while coarser grinding did not improve growth performance, although some digestibility measurements were slightly increased (Calderon-Cortes et al., 1996). This suggests that sudangrass hay can provide effective roughage in finishing diets, but excessive inclusion may depress diet energy value.

Sudan grass hay can also be a conserved forage option in tropical systems. In Brazil, chopped sudangrass hay had intermediate hay yield compared with other tropical grasses and had one of the highest crude protein concentrations and the highest estimated total digestible nutrients among the hays evaluated (Aguiar et al., 2006b). In India, a fresh mixture of ricebean and sorghum-sudan fodder fed ad libitum supported moderate growth and positive nitrogen balance in crossbred calves, but dry matter intake and digestible crude protein and total digestible nutrient intakes were insufficient for higher target gains (Singh et al., 2000). In Mexicali, Mexico, in feedlot finishing diets based on steam-flaked maize, Sudan grass hay acted as a roughage source, but increasing its inclusion from 8 to 16% of diet dry matter depressed performance (Calderon-Cortes et al., 1996).

Silage and baleage are useful conservation forms, particularly where haymaking is difficult, but high moisture can impair fermentation. In China, wilting Sudan grass before ensiling, particularly with molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum, improved fermentation quality and in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics (Wan et al., 2021). In South Korea, inoculation of high-moisture sorghum-sudangrass silage improved fermentation quality, aerobic stability and in vitro dry matter digestibility (Paradhipta et al., 2019). These studies support wilting and suitable inoculation when Sudan grass-type forages are ensiled at high moisture.

In beef cow-calf systems, sorghum-sudangrass baleage can maintain performance but may be penalised by wastage and cost. In Alabama, sorghum-sudangrass baleage supported cow body weight, body condition, milk production and calf gain similarly to pearl millet baleage and bermudagrass hay, but baleage waste and production costs were higher than for bermudagrass hay under the conditions of the trial (Panhans et al., 2020).

Dairy cattle

Sorghum-sudangrass silage can be useful in dairy heifer programmes because its high fibre and moderate energy concentration can help control excess energy intake. In Holstein heifers, sorghum-sudangrass silage-based diets reduced DM, CP and energy intakes compared with a control diet and kept average daily gain within the target range for replacement heifers (Li et al., 2019). This use differs from high-producing lactating cow diets, where large replacement of maize and lucerne silages by sudangrass silage may reduce intake and milk output.

In a US lactating dairy cow trial reported as a conference abstract, increasing inclusion of BMR sudangrass silage from 0 to 30% of diet DM linearly reduced DM intake, milk yield, component yields and energy-corrected milk, while feed efficiency was not affected (Kalscheur et al., 2016). This suggests that even BMR sudangrass silage should be introduced cautiously in diets for high-producing dairy cows and balanced for energy and protein supply.

Where BMR sudangrass was the main forage in balanced dairy cow diets, the method of conservation affected dairy product quality more than milk yield. In Italy, BMR sudangrass fed as hay or silage resulted in similar milk yield and milk fat, but the hay and silage diets led to differences in volatile compounds and sensory properties of Caciocavallo cheese; hay cheese also tended to be preferred by consumers at longer ripening time (Serrapica et al., 2020).

In vitro evidence supports the use of BMR sorghum-sudangrass as a pasture component for dairy systems. In continuous culture, BMR sorghum-sudangrass fermented broadly similarly to cool-season grass-legume pasture, with no evident adverse effect on total volatile fatty acids or microbial nitrogen variables (Ruh et al., 2018). This type of result should be treated as supportive rather than as a substitute for animal performance trials.

Sheep

Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids can be used for sheep as pasture or silage, but the available evidence is uneven and often based on in vitro or degradability studies rather than long-term performance trials. In Italy, late-lactation Sarda ewes grazing sorghum-sudangrass under Mediterranean summer conditions produced slightly more milk than ewes grazing teff, although teff pasture had higher CP and lower ADF and lignin. The authors considered both crops suitable summer forages, with the usual caution that sorghum-sudangrass requires management of cyanogenic risk (Primi et al., 2025).

Recent feeding evidence with sheep supports the partial replacement of maize silage by sorghum-sudangrass silage. In a Chinese trial with Hu sheep, replacing half of the whole-plant maize silage component with sorghum-sudangrass silage improved growth, rumen fermentation and microbial profile, while full replacement did not depress growth (Li et al., 2025).

Legume-sudangrass silages may improve the protein value of Sudan grass-based conserved forages. In Türkiye, adding Hungarian vetch to sudangrass silage improved rumen degradability of dry matter and crude protein in a nylon-bag study, and the authors suggested 25-50% vetch inclusion for mixed silage (Demirel et al., 2003). In Serbia, Sudan grass had lower rumen-degradable protein than lucerne, and ensiling Sudan grass with lucerne or red clover reduced protein degradability compared with pure legume silages, suggesting a possible role for Sudan grass in improving nitrogen-use efficiency in legume-based diets (Stojanovi̇ć et al., 2020).

BMR sorghum-sudangrass hybrids may have higher ruminal fibre degradability than conventional hybrids. In Brazil, BMR sorghum-sudangrass hybrids harvested for cutting or grazing had higher dry matter and NDF disappearance after ruminal incubation in sheep, and higher effective fibre degradability at different passage rates, than conventional hybrids (Silva et al., 2018).

A Turkish year-round pasture study including sorghum-sudangrass as a summer pasture component for Karacabey Merino ewes and lambs found differences in haematological traits among pasture types and production systems. The authors advised monitoring animal health indicators and providing appropriate mineral and vitamin supplementation when needed, but the study does not provide enough evidence to rank sorghum-sudangrass against other summer forages on performance grounds (Tölü et al., 2025).

Goats

Specific recent goat feeding trials with Sudan grass or sorghum-sudangrass hybrids were not identified in the selected literature. Practical use in goats should therefore follow the same principles as for other ruminants: Sudan grass may be offered as pasture, fresh forage, hay or silage, but it should not be grazed or fed when immature, drought-stressed, frost-damaged or suspected of high nitrate or hydrocyanic acid concentration. Conserved forage should be well cured or well fermented, and diets should be balanced for protein, energy and minerals.

Horses and donkeys 

Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids should be used cautiously in horses as they can cause serious health problems (see Potential constraints). Still, they can be considered as annual warm-season pastures for horses, particularly to provide forage during the summer slump of cool-season grasses. In Minnesota, Sudan grass and sorghum-sudangrass had high yields and good regrowth under short-duration horse grazing, and their nutritive value was generally sufficient for adult horses at maintenance or moderate exercise. Sudan grass was one of the more promising warm-season grasses in the 2017 trial, although annual ryegrass and teff (Eragrostis tef) were generally more preferred, and a later summary of horse pasture trials classified Sudan grass among high-yielding but less preferred forages. Their lower non-structural carbohydrate concentrations may be useful for horses requiring restricted sugar and starch intake, but their use should remain conditional on pasture testing for nitrate-nitrogen and calcium-to-phosphorus balance (DeBoer et al., 2017; Martinson, 2024)

Nutritional tables
Tables of chemical composition and nutritional value 

Avg: average or predicted value; SD: standard deviation; Min: minimum value; Max: maximum value; Nb: number of values (samples) used

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 20.8 3.3 15.6 29.3 30  
Crude protein % DM 11.0 3.6 6.2 19.3 59  
Crude fibre % DM 30.9 2.2 26.4 34.5 17  
NDF % DM 66.4 7.3 49.3 70.0 6 *
ADF % DM 36.4 3.6 28.8 42.0 38 *
Lignin % DM 4.6   4.5 6.6 2 *
Ether extract % DM 2.7 0.6 1.6 3.7 10  
Ash % DM 9.7 2.0 5.5 12.7 28  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 18.2         *
               
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Calcium g/kg DM 4.6 0.7 3.5 5.4 6  
Phosphorus g/kg DM 1.5 0.7 0.8 2.4 6  
Potassium g/kg DM 19.6       1  
Magnesium g/kg DM 1.1       1  
Zinc mg/kg DM 21       1  
Copper mg/kg DM 14       1  
               
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 66.5 5.6 60.0 78.0 12 *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 63.6         *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 11.6         *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 9.3         *
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 68.2 6.1 59.3 78.7 12  

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Aguiar et al., 2006; Alibes et al., 1990; CGIAR, 2009; Gomez Cabrera, 2009; Tisserand et al., 1989; Van Wyk et al., 1951; Vargas et al., 1965

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:12

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Dry matter % as fed 91.8 2.8 87.8 95.5 6  
Crude protein % DM 10.0 2.1 7.3 12.9 9  
Crude fibre % DM 33.5 1.9 31.7 35.7 5  
NDF % DM 68.7 2.4 64.7 69.7 4 *
ADF % DM 39.2 3.1 39.2 47.1 4 *
Lignin % DM 5.2 0.3 4.5 5.2 4 *
Ether extract % DM 1.8 0.2 1.6 2.0 3  
Ash % DM 10.7 1.1 8.9 12.4 9  
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 17.8         *
               
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
Calcium g/kg DM 2.7       1  
Phosphorus g/kg DM 3.3       1  
Potassium g/kg DM 30.6       1  
Magnesium g/kg DM 2.2       1  
               
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb  
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 60.9 4.8 57.3 66.8 3 *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 57.4         *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 10.2         *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 8.2         *
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 51.8 9.5 45.1 62.6 3  

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.

References

Aguiar et al., 2006; Aguiar et al., 2006; Alibes et al., 1990; Ledgerwood et al., 2009; Sarcicek et al., 2002; Van Wyk et al., 1951

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:12

References
References 
Datasheet citation 

Heuzé V., Tran G., 2026. Sudan grass (Sorghum × drummondii). Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/375 Last updated on July 3, 2026, 0:01

English correction by Tim Smith (Animal Science consultant) and Hélène Thiollet (AFZ)