Feedipedia
Animal feed resources information system
Feedipedia
Feedipedia

Did you find the information you were looking for? Is it valuable to you? Feedipedia is encountering funding shortage. We need your help to keep providing reference-based feeding recommendations for your animals.
Would you consider donating? If yes, please click on the button Donate.

Any amount is the welcome. Even one cent is helpful to us!

Mulato grass (Brachiaria hybrid)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This datasheet is pending revision and updating; its contents are currently derived from FAO's Animal Feed Resources Information System (1991-2002) and from Bo Göhl's Tropical Feeds (1976-1982).

Datasheet

Description
Click on the "Nutritional aspects" tab for recommendations for ruminants, pigs, poultry, rabbits, horses, fish and crustaceans
Common names 

Mulato grass, Mulato, Mulato I, Mulato II, brachiaria hybrid grass, hybrid brachiariagrass, Urochloa hybrid, Brachiaria Mulato II

Taxonomic information 

The Brachiaria species used in these hybrids are now often placed in the genus Urochloa, and papers therefore use both Brachiaria and Urochloa names for the same forage material.

Description 

Mulato grasses are hybrids of tropical grasses of the Brachiaria (Urochloa) genus. Mulato I (Brachiaria hybrid CIAT 36061) is an hybrid of Brachiaria ruziziensis and Brachiaria brizantha. Mulato II (Brachiaria hybrid CIAT 36087) is an hybrid of Brachiaria ruziziensisBrachiaria brizantha, and Brachiara decumbens.

Morphological description

Mulato is a vigorous perennial grass with semi-erect to decumbent growth, cylindrical pubescent stems, abundant leafy tillers and stoloniferous stems capable of rooting at the nodes. Mulato leaves are lanceolate, intensely green and pubescent, and its inflorescence is a terminal panicle or spike-like panicle with several racemes (Argel et al., 2006; Guiot et al., 2003). Mulato I is semi-erect, 40-60 cm high, with leaf blades about 40 cm long and 25 mm wide, 4-8 racemes per panicle and about 115000 seeds/kg. Mulato II has a semi-erect to semi-decumbent tussock, 80-100 cm high without inflorescences and up to 140 cm at flowering, with leaf blades 40-60 cm long and 24 mm wide, 4-6 racemes per panicle and about 125000 seeds/kg (Tropical Forages, 2020).

Utilization

Mulato and Mulato II are used mainly as grazing forages for cattle and small ruminants, but they can also used in cut-and-carry systems, as fresh, or hay, haylage or silage when managed at an appropriate regrowth stage (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007; Adnew et al., 2021). The hybrids are also used as grazed ground cover in plantations (Tropical Forages, 2020). The high leaf proportion and good palatability of these hybrids are important contributors to their use in tropical meat and milk production systems (Guiot et al., 2003; Argel et al., 2006). Mulato and Mulato II have been used in push-pull systems for the control of cereal stem borers and Striga weeds in maize and sorghum systems in Africa (Tropical Forages, 2020). Under irrigated subtropical conditions in Australia, Mulato II partitioned more dry matter (DM) to leaves and less to stems than Gatton panic and Rhodes grass, with 9.7 t leaf DM/ha and 2.8 t kg stem DM/ha accumulated over five harvests (Jayasinghe et al., 2022a).

Distribution 

Mulato I and Mulato II were developed by the Tropical Forages Project of the Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) in Colombia, and released commercially in 2000 and 2005 respectively (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007). Mulato II replaced Mulato I in some commercial seed markets because it combined high forage value with better seed production and drought tolerance (Argel et al., 2007; Hare et al., 2015). The hybrids have been evaluated or used in tropical and subtropical environments of Latin America, Central America, Thailand, the United States, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Indonesia, Trinidad and Tobago, and Australia (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007; Hare et al., 2015; Inyang et al., 2010; Adnew et al., 2021; Mutimura et al., 2017; Maranatha et al., 2019; Leon et al., 2023; Jayasinghe et al., 2022a).

Mulato grows from sea level to about 1800 m altitude in humid tropics with high rainfall and short dry periods, and in subhumid areas with 5 to 6 dry months when annual rainfall is above about 700 mm (Argel et al., 2006). Mulato II also grows from sea level to about 1800 m altitude and is adapted to humid and subhumid tropics, subtropical areas with occasional frosts and well-drained acid soils (Argel et al., 2007). Mulato requires medium to high fertility and good drainage, while Mulato II has wider adaptation to acid and low-fertility soils but still responds to fertilization (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007).

In Rwanda, Mulato and Mulato II were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at about 1400 m altitude and 650-900 mm annual rainfall, which confirms interest in these hybrids beyond humid lowlands (Mutimura et al., 2017). In subtropical Queensland, Australia, Mulato II was evaluated under irrigation at Gatton and performed well enough to be considered an attractive forage option for dairying in tropical and subtropical climates (Jayasinghe et al., 2022a). In Florida, Mulato II is recommended mainly for South Florida because productivity and persistence decline at latitudes above about 28 degrees north, and above-ground forage browns rapidly after frost (Vendramini et al., 2017). In Quintana Roo, Mexico, Mulato established under 1172 mm annual rainfall and was evaluated under rotational grazing, supporting its use as an option for livestock systems in the Mexican tropics (Rubio et al., 2023).

Mulato does not tolerate permanent flooding or poorly drained heavy soils, and low adaptation to sites with drainage problems has been reported in humid environments (Argel et al., 2006; Guiot et al., 2003). Mulato II tolerates moderate waterlogging better than Mulato (Argel et al., 2007). Stands can die after more than about one week of waterlogged soil conditions (Tropical Forages, 2020; Vendramini et al., 2017). Mulato II is sensitive to cold: in North Florida, Mulato II ground cover was 36% after the 2008-2009 winter versus 73% for Tifton 85, and after a more severe winter it fell to 10-12% compared with 73% for Tifton 85. Because of this cold sensitivity, Mulato II may behave as a high-quality short-lived perennial or annual forage in cooler subtropical areas rather than as a persistent perennial (Vendramini et al., 2012; Vendramini et al., 2017).

Forage management 

Establishment

Mulato and Mulato II are apomictic hybrids, so they are genetically stable after release and do not segregate from one generation to the next. They are usually established by seed, although vegetative propagation with rooted stems or cuttings is possible (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007; Guiot et al., 2003). For Mulato, producer-oriented recommendations in Mexico used about 6 kg seed/ha, while other Central American and Colombian recommendations reported 3 to 5 kg/ha of high-quality seed (Guiot et al., 2003). For Mulato II, Mexican and Australian experiments used 8 kg/ha of viable pure seed, which indicates that practical seeding rates vary with seed quality, equipment and local establishment objectives (Garcia et al., 2020; Jayasinghe et al., 2022a).

Mulato seed should be placed shallowly, since sowing deeper than about 2 cm can impair emergence (Guiot et al., 2003). It has been recommended for Brachiaria hybrids to sow 4-6 kg seed/ha, up to 10 kg/ha when conditions require it, into a well-prepared seedbed; freshly harvested seed may remain dormant for several months and can require storage or acid scarification before planting. These hybrids can also be planted vegetatively from rooted slips or stolon cuttings and, under good conditions, can be lightly grazed 3-4 months after sowing (Tropical Forages, 2020). In Florida extension recommendations, commercial Mulato II seed germinates in 5-10 days in a moist, firm seedbed; seed is broadcast at about 11 kg/ha and covered with about 1.3 cm of soil (Vendramini et al., 2017). In Quintana Roo, Mexico, a 7 kg/ha seeding rate was used and Mulato reached more than 80% cover after about 150 days; at 12 weeks it had 77% cover, 25 plants/m2 and 62 cm plant height (Rubio et al., 2023).

Fertilization and soil fertility

Mulato can require maintenance fertilization because its productivity is high and the effect of fertilizer may decline within a few months (Argel et al., 2006). Mulato II responds well to nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), and split annual applications of 100 to 150 kg N/ha and about 50 kg P/ha may be useful according to soil fertility (Argel et al., 2007).

In intensively managed Brazilian pastures, Mulato II was fertilized with high annual rates of N and potassium (K), and the resulting forage accumulation averaged 8090 kg DM/ha/year over two summer rainy seasons (Almeida et al., 2023). In a dry-land Indonesian experiment, a mixed culture with legume and horticultural plants increased Mulato CP (crude protein) from 9.7% in monoculture to 12.8% in the polyculture treatment, suggesting a role for companion crops where soil fertility and moisture are limiting (Maranatha et al., 2019). In Florida, extension recommendations use a target soil pH of 5.5-6.0 and emphasize soil testing, P and K correction and split N applications; more than about 112 kg N/ha should not be applied in a single application because of leaching and volatilization risks (Vendramini et al., 2017). Under simulated continuous stocking in Brazil, increasing N from 50 to 250 kg/ha/year increased Mulato II herbage accumulation from 7.9 to 13.4 t DM/ha/year and increased CP from 10.6% to 16.4% (Silva et al., 2016).

Grazing and cutting management

Mulato should be managed to balance yield and quality, since longer regrowth and lighter residual heights increase forage mass but also increase fiber content (NDF and ADF). In Tabasco, Mexico, the highest annual forage accumulation of Mulato was obtained with a 28-day grazing frequency, while the highest digestible dry matter and CP were obtained with 14-day grazing  (Cruz-Hernandez et al., 2017).

For Mulato I under monthly cutting in irrigated northeastern Brazil, 20 to 30 cm cutting heights improved leaf number, green leaf number, leaf size and total DM production, while cutting at 10 cm reduced production and cutting around 40 cm reduced the leaf:stem ratio (Dutra et al., 2014). For Mulato II in the dry tropics of Mexico, cutting between 35 and 42 days after regrowth at a 15 cm residual height was recommended because it combined good structural traits with about 95% intercepted radiation (Garcia et al., 2020). In Florida, very frequent harvesting every 2 weeks combined with short stubble heights reduced Mulato II persistence, despite high herbage accumulation and nutritive value (Inyang et al., 2010). In Brazil, Mulato II pastures maintained at 20 cm under continuous stocking had a more favorable canopy structure and nutritive value than pastures maintained at 30 cm, and the authors recommended 20 cm average canopy height under continuous stocking (Almeida et al., 2023).

Another Brazilian continuous-stocking study found that Mulato II herbage accumulation increased from 8.5 to 13.4 t  DM/ha/year as canopy height increased from 10 to 40 cm, while in vitro digestible organic matter declined from 65.2% to 58.6% and grazing efficiency declined from 65% to 54%; the authors considered about 25 cm a useful compromise (Silva et al., 2016). For rotationally stocked Mulato, a 95% light-interception target corresponded to about 30 cm pre-grazing height, while maximum light interception corresponded to about 40 cm; the 95% target maintained more leaves and less stem and dead material (Silveira et al., 2016). A later analysis of the same Mulato system reported higher forage accumulation when grazing was initiated at 95% light interception rather than at maximum light interception, about 160 versus 120 kg DM/ha/day, because stem growth and senescence were better controlled (Rodrigues et al., 2024).

In Florida, Mulato II had declining CP and in vitro digestible organic matter as grazing interval increased from 2 to 6 weeks, while ground cover increased; regrowth intervals shorter than 3 weeks should be avoided to maintain hybrid Brachiaria stands (Vendramini et al., 2014). Florida extension guidance recommends rotational grazing for Mulato II, with a target grazing stubble height of 15-25 cm (Vendramini et al., 2017).

During establishment in semi-arid Rwanda, Mulato II reached its highest organic matter digestibility (OMD) and metabolizable energy (ME) values at 90 days after planting, but its CP declined from 14.7% at 60 days to 13.7% at 90 days and 11.4% at 120 days (Mutimura et al., 2017). Supplementation strategies can also be used to manage quality, since adding tropical kudzu to Mulato II harvested at 4 or 8 weeks of regrowth raised the mixture to about 13.3-13.4% CP in Trinidad and Tobago (Leon et al., 2023; Leon et al., 2025).

Yield

Mulato forage yield depends on site and management and has been reported at about 10 to 25 t DM/ha/year, with 17% to 20% of annual production occurring during the dry period (Argel et al., 2006). Mulato II forage yield has been reported at about 10 to 27 t DM/ha/year, with about 20% of annual production possible during the dry season (Argel et al., 2007).

In Thailand, Mulato II maintained a high leaf percentage across wet and dry seasons and no tested hybrid line consistently surpassed it for dry-season forage accumulation and leaf proportion (Hare et al., 2015). In irrigated subtropical Australia, Gatton panic produced more total above-ground biomass than Mulato II, but Mulato II produced the highest leaf mass and the lowest stem mass among the three tested grasses (Jayasinghe et al., 2022a). Under continuous stocking in the Brazilian Amazon biome, Mulato II accumulated 17.4 t DM/ha/year, about 15% more than the Brachiaria brizantha hybrid Ipypora, although Ipypora was more suitable for diversification where Mahanarva spittlebugs are a severe risk (Paraiso et al., 2019).

In North Florida, perennial Mulato II produced 11.3 t DM/ha in the 2009 clipping study, similar to Tifton 85 and more than the annual treatments, but stand recovery after winter was weaker than Tifton 85 (Vendramini et al., 2012). In a Colombian pasture-rehabilitation case study, Mulato produced 3.6-5.3 t/ha of dry green forage 95 days after sowing and 4.8-5.4 t/ha during 72 days of the low-rainfall period (Plazas, 2006). In Quintana Roo, Mexico, Mulato forage offer ranged from about 0.91 to 3.90 t DM/ha under rotational grazing, declining during the lower-rainfall months and increasing again when rainfall resumed (Rubio et al., 2023).

Environmental impact 

Ground cover

Brachiaria hybrids can provide good ground cover for erosion control on hillsides and for suppression of invasive species (Tropical Forages, 2020). Mulato can be used as a cover crop in degraded cropping systems because its root system and surface stubble can protect soil and support nutrient cycling. In a degraded common bean monoculture in Argentina, one or two cycles of Mulato grass as a cover crop increased soil microbial activity, including fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis and acid phosphatase activity, compared with the monoculture control. The same cover-crop study found higher soil organic carbon under two Mulato cover-crop cycles than under common bean monoculture, and the two-cycle Mulato treatment had a lower metabolic quotient than the control, indicating greater microbial metabolic efficiency (Brandan et al., 2017).

Mulato's stoloniferous growth and high soil cover can also help it compete with weeds and maintain pasture cover under grazing (Guiot et al., 2003). In Colombian degraded-pasture rehabilitation, Mulato was used alone or in association with maize to restore degraded Brachiaria pastures and to take advantage of residual soil fertility in crop-pasture systems (Plazas, 2006).

Carbon sequestration and CH4 emissions

Brachiaria grasses are reported to contribute to carbon sequestration and biological nitrification inhibition, but the specific environmental performance of Mulato and Mulato II should still be described cautiously because cultivar-specific evidence remains limited (Adnew et al., 2021).

A meta-analysis of tropical pasture nutritive values found that estimated CH4 production varied only slightly among tropical grasses, but lower fiber Brachiaria entries were among the lower estimated CH4 values in the database (Jayasinghe et al., 2022b). In vitro studies with Mulato II and elephant grass (Cenchrus purpureus) supplemented with kudzu to a 13.0% CP target reduced estimated CH4 yield by about 17%, suggesting that improving the protein balance of tropical grass diets may also improve environmental performance (Leon et al., 2025). A review of Brachiaria in smallholder dairy systems also emphasized its potential for forage availability, carbon storage and reduced enteric methane relative to some conventional tropical feeds, but it noted that more controlled animal-performance research is needed in Southern Africa (Marlon et al., 2025).

Nutritional aspects
Nutritional attributes 

Mulato has generally been described as a high-quality tropical grass, with CP values commonly reported around 9% to 16% and in vitro DM (IVDM) digestibility around 55% to 62% in 25- to 30-day regrowth during the rainy season (Argel et al., 2006). Mulato II has also been described a high-quality grass, with CP values around 8% to 16% and IVDM around 55% to 66% in 25- to 30-day regrowth during the wet period (Argel et al., 2007). 

The nutritive value of Mulato and Mulato II varies with cultivar, regrowth age, season, plant part, fertility, companion crops and defoliation intensity (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007; Cruz-Hernandez et al., 2017; Almeida et al., 2023; Maranatha et al., 2019; Leon et al., 2023). In a Colombian grazing comparison, Mulato II had higher CP than Mulato in both rainy and dry seasons, with CP of 11.4% in the rainy season and 8.4% in the dry season (Argel et al., 2007). In a Florida harvest-management study, CP ranged from about 14% to 17% and in vitro digestible organic matter (IVDMO) ranged from about 66% to 67%, with higher nutritive value at shorter stubble heights (Inyang et al., 2010). A meta-analysis of tropical pastures found that Mulato II had up to about 8.1 MJ ME/kg DM across the compiled studies, placing it among the better-performing Brachiaria entries for digestibility and energy (Jayasinghe et al., 2022b). Under continuous stocking in Brazil, increasing Mulato II canopy height from 10 to 40 cm reduced CP from 15.0% to 12.1% and IVDMO from 65.2% to 58.6%, illustrating the quality cost of taller canopies (Silva et al., 2016). High yield is often obtained at longer regrowth, but quality declines when stems and dead material increase; therefore, harvest age and residual height should be adapted to the production objective (Cruz-Hernandez et al., 2017; Garcia et al., 2020; Mutimura et al., 2017).

Potential constraints 

Steroidal saponins are a possible constraint because Brachiaria species can cause hepatogenous photosensitization in ruminants, particularly in susceptible sheep, young animals and animals with no previous exposure to the pasture. In the Colombian Eastern Plains, protodioscin concentrations above the 1% minimum toxic level were found in B. decumbens and in the B. ruziziensis x B. decumbens x B. brizantha hybrid, with the hybrid ranging from 0.77% to 3.68% and reaching 3.37% at 28 days in the dry season in the piedemonte region. However, this was reported for a Brachiaria hybrid of the same parentage group rather than for a named Mulato II feeding trial, so it should be used as a caution rather than as direct proof of Mulato II toxicity under all conditions (Lozano et al., 2017).

Ruminants 

Mulato and Mulato II are good-quality tropical forages for ruminants when managed to maintain a leafy canopy, and the evidence supports their use as pasture for dairy and beef cattle, as cut-and-carry forage, and as hay or mixed roughage for small ruminants (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007; Demski et al., 2019; Adnew et al., 2021; Mena, 2007; Leon et al., 2025). The best results are expected when the grass is not allowed to become too stemmy and when soil fertility, companion legumes and defoliation intensity are managed according to the production objective (Cruz-Hernandez et al., 2017; Inyang et al., 2010; Almeida et al., 2023; Leon et al., 2023). Mulato and Mulato II can be conserved as hay, haylage or silage when climate permits, but harvest timing should avoid excessive stem and dead material if the objective is high-quality ruminant forage (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007; Cruz-Hernandez et al., 2017). Florida extension describes Mulato II as more digestible than Bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) and attractive for conserved forage (Vendramini et al., 2017).

Palatability and nutritive value

Bovine intake of Mulato and Mulato II has been described as high, and this is consistent with their high leafiness and relatively high CP compared with many tropical grasses (Argel et al., 2006; Argel et al., 2007). In Thailand, Mulato II retained a high leaf percentage across seasons, which supports its use in grazing systems where intake depends strongly on leaf availability (Hare et al., 2015). In Australia, Mulato II had a leafy canopy structure, high leaf bulk density and higher ME than Rhodes grass, which supports further evaluation for pasture-based dairy systems (Jayasinghe et al., 2022a).

Pasture

Mulato grass, particularly Mulato II, is best considered as a high-quality Brachiaria pasture for well-managed dairy and beef systems rather than as a low-input roughage. Under rotational grazing, it has supported higher milk production than several standard Brachiaria pastures and high liveweight gain per hectare, mainly through good forage availability, high stocking capacity and favourable nutritive value .

Dairy cows

In Colombia, cows grazing Mulato II produced 11% more milk in the dry season and 23% more in the rainy season than cows grazing Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk or B. brizantha cv. Toledo pastures. In Tabasco, Mexico, Brown Swiss cows grazing fertilized Mulato II in rotational stocking produced 10.9 kg milk/cow/day, compared with 9.7 kg milk/cow/day for cows grazing Mulato, at a stocking rate of 4 cows/ha (Argel et al., 2007). In Honduras, individual cow milk yield on Mulato did not differ from other monitored grasses, but higher stocking rates on Mulato resulted in higher milk output per hectare (Argel et al., 2006). In a Colombian rehabilitation case study, 12 dual-purpose cows produced 79 kg milk/day on degraded B. decumbens and 102 kg milk/day on the new Mulato pasture during a 15-day rotational grazing cycle; production returned to the initial level when cows were moved back to B. decumbens (Plazas, 2006). In Brazil, Holstein cows grazing Mulato II under rotational stocking at 25 cm pre-grazing height and 15 to 20 cm post-grazing height produced 15.3 kg milk/cow/day, compared with 14.3 kg milk/cow/day on Marandu pasture. Mulato II pastures had higher tiller density than Marandu, 822 versus 636 tillers/m2, and higher CP, 14.4% versus 13.0%, which may have contributed to shorter nighttime grazing activity and higher milk yield (Demski et al., 2019). 

Beef cattle and heifers

Mulato pastures supported high stocking rates and high liveweight production per hectare in Latin American beef-cattle trials (Argel et al., 2006; Guiot et al., 2003). In Gualaca, Panama, cattle grazing Mulato under rotational management reached 0.54 kg/day and 879 kg liveweight gain/ha/year, while in Cerete, Colombia, Mulato produced 796 kg liveweight gain/ha/year and outperformed Basilisk for stocking rate and gain per hectare (Argel et al., 2006). In Tabasco, Mexico Mulato pasture maintained 4 cattle/ha over a year and averaged 0.44 kg/day liveweight gain and 636 kg liveweight gain/ha/year under local conditions (Guiot et al., 2003). In Quintana Roo, Mexico steers grazing Mulato gained 675 g/animal/day, not statistically different from 0.65 kg/animal/day on Chetumal grass at 1.5 animal units/ha (Rubio et al., 2023). In North Florida, heifers grazing Mulato II had greater herbage allowance and average daily gain than heifers grazing pearl millet or sorghum-sudangrass, 0.78 versus 0.43 and 0.39 kg/day, but gain per hectare was similar because annual grasses carried a higher stocking rate (Vendramini et al., 2012). In the Colombian Llanos, short rehabilitation trials with Mulato reported high short-term liveweight gains, including 2.1 kg/animal/day for finishing steers receiving 1 kg concentrate/day and 1.7 kg/day for females grazing a maize-Mulato association; these figures should be read as short case-study results rather than general recommendations (Plazas, 2006). In Rwanda, heifers fed a cut-and-carry Mulato II-based diet did not differ statistically from those fed a commercial-concentrate-based diet in growth performance, indicating potential for replacement-heifer feeding on smallholder farms (Marlon et al., 2025).

Goats

In Honduras, goats and hair sheep offered fresh 21-day Mulato II had similar DM intake, 26.6 and 27.8 g DM/kg live weight, but apparent DM digestibility was higher in goats than in sheep, 66.0% versus 61.4% (Mena, 2007).

Hay

In Ethiopia, Mulato II hay had adequate CP to support weight gain in lambs, whereas natural pasture hay was below the CP level required for maintenance and gain. Replacing natural pasture hay with Mulato II hay increased intake, nutrient digestibility, average daily gain, feed conversion efficiency and most carcass variables. In that 90-day feeding trial, average daily gain increased from 39.6 g/day on 100% natural pasture hay to 82.7 g/day on 100% Mulato II hay, with all lambs also receiving 300 g DM/head/day of concentrate mixture. DM digestibility increased from 62% to 79% and CP digestibility increased from 64% to 83% as the roughage component changed from 100% natural pasture hay to 100% Mulato II hay. Hot carcass weight increased from 9.0 kg on the natural pasture hay diet to 12.4 kg on the 100% Mulato II hay diet, and rib-eye area increased from 6.06 to 8.28 cm² (Adnew et al., 2021).

Nutritional tables
Tables of chemical composition and nutritional value 
References
References 
Datasheet citation 

DATASHEET UNDER CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT QUOTE. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/27814 Last updated on June 25, 2026, 15:18