Banana peels
Description and recommendations
Common names
Banana, french plantain, plantain, cooking banana, bananier, banane, platano, banana caturra, banana da terra, banana de São Tomé, banana maçã, banana ouro, banana prata, banano, pisang (Indonesia, Malaysia), saging (Philippines), nget pyo thee (Burma), cheek nam' vaa (Cambodia), kwàyz (Laos), kluai (Thailand), chuối (Vietnam) (Espino et al., 1991; Göhl, 1982).
Product name: banana peels, plantain peels
Related feed(s)
Description
Banana peels are the outer envelopes of banana fruits. They are the by-product of household consumption and banana processing.
Distribution
Banana peels are available in populated areas or in the vicinity of banana processing plants. They can be found in all tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, America, Africa and Australia where bananas are grown. For more information about the distribution of bananas, see the Banana (general) datasheet.
Potential constraints
Tannins
Tannins are the main antinutritional factors of bananas and are mostly contained in the peels. Ripening causes those tannins to migrate to the pulp or to be degraded by by polyphenol oxidases and peroxidases (Emaga et al., 2011). In addition to their antinutritional effects, particularly in monogastrics, banana tannins are responsible for the astringent taste of immature fruits, making them less palatable than mature fruits (Ly, 2004).
Mycotoxins
In 1986, cases of mycotoxin contamination due to Fusarium were reported in banana fruits grown in India (Swamy, 2009).
Pesticides
As bananas are subject to heavy pesticide applications, feeding animals with banana fruits or stalks may result in toxic residues in animal tissues. An Australian survey assessing 28 banana pesticides reported that carbaryl, chlorothalonil, dicofol and prochloraz could be responsible for residue violations in meat and edible offal (MacLachlan, 2006).
Nutritional attributes
Banana peels contain 6-9 % DM of protein, 20-30 % NDF, and variable quantities of starch and solubles sugars, depending on the stage of maturity. Green plantain peels contain 40 % starch that is fully transformed into sugars after ripening. Green banana peels contain much less starch (about 15 %) when green while ripe banana peels contain up to 30% free sugars. Lignin content increases with ripening (from 7 to 15 % DM). Plantain peels contain less fibre than banana peels (Happi Emaga et al., 2011).
Tables of chemical composition and nutritional value
Ruminants
Banana peels are widely used by smallholders as supplementary feeds for cattle and small ruminants in the tropics (Onwuka et al., 1997; Happi Emaga et al., 2011). Their nutritive value for ruminants is estimated to be similar to that of cassava peels or citrus peels. Green peels contain more metabolizable energy than ripe peels. The study of these variations and of the potential effects of the changes in tannin content during ripening requires further research (Happi Emaga et al., 2011).
Cattle
Dairy cows fed up to 21 kg of fresh ripe banana peels increased milk production (Dormont et al., 1998). In grass-fed zebus, 15 to 30 % (on diet DM) banala peels were highly palatable and increased weight gain significantly without causing health problems, but banana supplementation was not cost-effective (Hernan Botero et al., 2000).
Goats
In goats, dry ripe plantain peels can fully replace maize grain without adverse effects on growth and animal performance, and were found an economical source of carbohydrates (Aregheore, 1998). Dairy goats fed a basal diet of banana peels supplemented with a legume forage performed adequately though butterfat and milk protein were lower than for diets based on maize leaves or Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) (Nambi et al., 2001).
Pigs
Like other banana products, banana peels can be a important staple feed for pigs for smallholder in banana-produding areas (Buragohain et al., 2010). Dried ripe banana peels could be fed to growing pigs up to 20 % of the diet without depressing growth, but higher inclusion rates caused poor growth (Rios et al., 1975). The nutritive value of ripe banana peels (14.0 MJ/kg DM) was found to be higher than for green peels (11.6 MJ/kg DM) (Tartrakoon et al., 1999).
Poultry
Broilers
Maximum inclusion rates of 7.5 % and 10 % dried banana peels have been suggested for broiler diets. In one experiment, dried plaintain peelings replacing maize grain resulted in a significant decrease of the weekly weight gains when included at more than 7.5 % in the diet (Tewe, 1983). In another experiment, liveweight gain and feed conversion efficiency were significantly higher in chickens fed on 10 % banana peel meal, and feed intake increased linearly with the level of banana peels. Growth performance decreased when the inclusion rate exceeded 10 % (Sabutan, 1996).
Ducks
An equal mixture of banana peels and golden snail (Pomacea canaliculata) meat could replace up to 90 % of a commercial diet (Ulepe et al., 1995).
Rabbits
Dried plantain peels can be included at 20-30 % in rabbit diets, particularly as a partial or even total replacement for maize grain (Fanimo et al., 1996). Ripeness may slightly improve their nutritive value (Fanimo et al., 2006). Sun-dried ripe plantain peels could replace up to 75 % of maize (27 % of the diet DM) or 100 % (19 % of the diet) in weaned rabbit diets with positive economic returns, though total replacement depressed performance (weight, feed conversion ratio, carcass quality) and digestibilities (Fanimo et al., 1996; Ajasin et al., 2006). A 3:1 mixture of dried and ground ripe banana peels and yam peels gave good performance in weaner rabbits and was the most cost effective when it replaced 50 % of maize grain (21 % of the diet) (Akinmutimi et al., 2006). Inclusion rates higher than 30 % can have detrimental effects on the final weight gain, daily weight gain and feed conversion efficiency (Fanimo et al., 2006).
Fish
African catfish (Clarias gariepinus)
Clarias gariepinus does not tolerate well diets containing high levels of plantain peel meal and plantain peel meal replacing maize grain in fingerling diets resulted in lower performance (Falaye et al., 1998).
Other species
Giant West African snail (Archachatina marginata)
Fresh plantain peels could be fed successfully to West African snails with no adverse effects but gave lower performance than papaya peels (Omole et al., 2004).
Feed categories
Citation
Heuzé V., Tran G., Archimède H., 2012. Banana peels. Feedipedia.org. A programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/684 Last updated on October 29, 2012, 16:23
Tables
Tables of chemical composition and nutritional value
| Main analysis | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Dry matter | % as fed | 15.4 | 14.1 | 16.6 | 2 | ||
| Crude protein | % DM | 7.1 | 6.3 | 7.9 | 2 | ||
| Crude fibre | % DM | 9.9 | 7.7 | 12.0 | 2 | ||
| Ether extract | % DM | 11.6 | 1 | ||||
| Ash | % DM | 12.0 | 10.6 | 13.4 | 2 | ||
| Gross energy | MJ/kg DM | 18.4 | * | ||||
| Minerals | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Calcium | g/kg DM | 4.6 | 1 | ||||
| Phosphorus | g/kg DM | 1.0 | 1 | ||||
| Potassium | g/kg DM | 42.0 | 1 | ||||
| Sodium | g/kg DM | 0.1 | 1 | ||||
| Iron | mg/kg DM | 60 | 1 | ||||
| Ruminant nutritive values | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| ME ruminants (FAO, 1982) | MJ/kg DM | 9.5 | 1 | ||||
| Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants | % | 34.1 | 1 | ||||
| Pig nutritive values | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Energy digestibility, growing pig | % | 74.6 | * | ||||
| DE growing pig | MJ/kg DM | 13.8 | * |
The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.
References
Ankrah, 1974; Honcamp, 1912; Oyenuga, 1968
Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:42
| Main analysis | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Dry matter | % as fed | 13.1 | 1 | ||||
| Crude protein | % DM | 6.7 | 5.6 | 7.7 | 2 | ||
| Crude fibre | % DM | 15.0 | 13.0 | 17.0 | 2 | ||
| Ether extract | % DM | 6.0 | 1 | ||||
| Ash | % DM | 13.2 | 9.8 | 16.5 | 2 | ||
| Gross energy | MJ/kg DM | 17.2 | * | ||||
| Minerals | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Calcium | g/kg DM | 3.5 | 1 | ||||
| Phosphorus | g/kg DM | 1.0 | 1 | ||||
| Potassium | g/kg DM | 36.0 | 1 | ||||
| Sodium | g/kg DM | 0.1 | 1 | ||||
| Iron | mg/kg DM | 67 | 1 | ||||
| Ruminant nutritive values | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| OM digestibility, Ruminant | % | 69.3 | 1 | ||||
| ME ruminants (FAO, 1982) | MJ/kg DM | 9.1 | 1 | ||||
| Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants | % | 22.0 | 1 | ||||
| Pig nutritive values | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Energy digestibility, growing pig | % | 66.6 | * | ||||
| DE growing pig | MJ/kg DM | 11.4 | * |
The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.
References
Ankrah, 1974; Maymone et al., 1951
Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:43:42
| Main analysis | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Dry matter | % as fed | 17.9 | 2.3 | 15.1 | 21.5 | 5 | |
| Crude protein | % DM | 8.4 | 0.9 | 7.3 | 9.5 | 5 | |
| Crude fibre | % DM | 8.7 | 3.5 | 5.6 | 14.0 | 5 | |
| Ether extract | % DM | 7.0 | 2.4 | 5.6 | 9.7 | 3 | |
| Ash | % DM | 12.0 | 3.0 | 9.3 | 17.2 | 5 | |
| Total sugars | % DM | 31.6 | 1 | ||||
| Gross energy | MJ/kg DM | 17.5 | * | ||||
| Minerals | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Calcium | g/kg DM | 1.9 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 3 | |
| Phosphorus | g/kg DM | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 3 | |
| Potassium | g/kg DM | 44.9 | 4.7 | 40.7 | 49.9 | 3 | |
| Sodium | g/kg DM | 0.1 | 1 | ||||
| Magnesium | g/kg DM | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2 | ||
| Iron | mg/kg DM | 60 | 1 | ||||
| Pig nutritive values | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Energy digestibility, growing pig | % | 76.5 | * | ||||
| DE growing pig | MJ/kg DM | 13.4 | * |
The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.
References
Ankrah, 1974; CIRAD, 1991; Ketiku, 1973; Oyenuga, 1968
Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:44:48
| Main analysis | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Dry matter | % as fed | 16.0 | 3.2 | 10.1 | 21.5 | 9 | |
| Crude protein | % DM | 8.3 | 1.3 | 6.6 | 11.3 | 10 | |
| Crude fibre | % DM | 7.4 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 14.0 | 10 | |
| NDF | % DM | 50.0 | 1 | ||||
| ADF | % DM | 15.4 | 1 | ||||
| Lignin | % DM | 4.5 | 1 | ||||
| Ether extract | % DM | 5.4 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 9.7 | 6 | |
| Ash | % DM | 10.8 | 3.0 | 5.6 | 17.2 | 10 | |
| Total sugars | % DM | 17.3 | 3.0 | 31.6 | 2 | ||
| Gross energy | MJ/kg DM | 17.3 | * | ||||
| Minerals | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Calcium | g/kg DM | 1.9 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 4 | |
| Phosphorus | g/kg DM | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 4 | |
| Potassium | g/kg DM | 43.7 | 4.5 | 40.0 | 49.9 | 4 | |
| Sodium | g/kg DM | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2 | ||
| Magnesium | g/kg DM | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2 | ||
| Iron | mg/kg DM | 54 | 48 | 60 | 2 | ||
| Pig nutritive values | Unit | Avg | SD | Min | Max | Nb | |
| Energy digestibility, growing pig | % | 78.5 | * | ||||
| DE growing pig | MJ/kg DM | 13.6 | * |
The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.
References
Ankrah, 1974; CIRAD, 1991; Ketiku, 1973; Omole et al., 2004; Onwuka et al., 1997; Oyenuga, 1968
Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:44:48