Support Feedipedia

Automatic translation

Who is visiting Feedipedia?


Editor area

Copra meal and coconut by-products

Description and recommendations

Common names

  • Copra meal, copra cake, coconut meal, coconut cake, expeller copra meal, expeller copra cake
  • Dessicated coconut waste, paring meal

Related feed(s)


Copra meal, or coconut meal, is an important feed ingredient and the by-product of the oil extraction from dried coconut kernels (copra).

The coconut tree

The coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.) is one of the most useful tropical trees. This multipurpose tree is used for food, beverage, shelter, animal feed and grown industrially for the edible and highly saturated oil contained in the flesh of its fruits. The tree can survive 50 years without needing much attention and the fruits drop all year long (Canapi et al., 2005). The nut (structure) has a smooth epidermis over a fibrous mesocarp (husk) that covers the hard endocarp (shell). A thin brown layer (testa) separates the shell from the endosperm (kernel, flesh, meat), which is approximately 1-2 cm thick. A cavity within the kernel contains the coconut water (Canapi et al., 2005).

Oil extraction

The coconuts are dehusked, split in halves, drained of coconut water and the halves are exposed to the sun for about a week until copra contains 6-8% water. Sun-drying is the cheapest method but if the weather is wet there is a risk of mold growth and aflatoxin contamination. Solar dryers reduce drying time and yield products less likely to be contaminated. Coconut husks and shells can be used as fuel for artificial drying on bamboo grill platforms. Direct exposure to smoke may give a light brown colour to copra and oil. Dryers equipped with a steel plate bottom give cleaner products (Canapi et al., 2005; Kurian et al., 2007). The dried copra is ground, flaked and cooked until moisture is brought down to 3%. The oil is mechanically extracted from the flakes using an expeller machine, resulting in a low-coloured oil and a copra cake containing about 7% oil. This cake can be pelletized and used as a feed, or solvent extracted using hexane, resulting in meal containing less than 3.5% oil (Canapi et al., 2005).

On average, 1000 nuts produce yields 180 kg of copra, and then 110 kg of oil and 55 kg of meal (Göhl, 1982). There is also a wet process that uses fresh kernels and provides high grade oil as well as valuable nutriments that are usually lost in the dry process (Canapi et al., 2005).

Coconut processing by-products

The main coconut by-product is the copra meal. Depending on the oil extraction method, the oil residue in the marketed product ranges from 1% to 22% (Göhl, 1982). Copra meal consists of light gray to yellowish pieces (flakes) of variable size, with a smooth, somewhat curved cut surface in the case of copra meal obtained by pressure only (TIS, 2013a; TIS, 2013b). In English, the terms copra cake and copra meal sometimes refer to the mechanically-extracted product (expeller copra meal) and to the solvent-extracted one respectively (FAO/IAEA, 2001). However, the names are often interchangeable in practice and this datasheet will use copra meal as a generic term to designate the oil by-product.

In addition to copra meal, other coconut products can be used to feed animals:

  • Copra itself is usually too expensive to use as an animal feed, though it has been fed to pigs and poultry with good results. As copra oil contains only small amounts of unsaturated fatty acids, its consumption leads to firm body fat and good flavour (Göhl, 1982).
  • Fresh coconut flesh and parings obtained after processing coconuts for direct human consumption are sometimes extracted to produce high-quality cooking oil or cosmetics (Aregheore, 2005; Göhl, 1982). The resulting oil meal is considered of higher value than copra meal: it contains a protein of higher biological value than that of coconut meal because it is not heat processed and it has more vitamins (Göhl, 1982; Grimwood et al., 1976).
  • Young coconut leaves are relished by livestock but removing the leaves damages the tree and animals should not enter coconut fields before the coconut trees are high enough (Fuller, 2004).
  • Coconut pith resulting from the fibre extraction is a rich source of soluble carbohydrates and is a potential source of energy for livestock (Viswanathan, 1980).
  • Coconut water is usually wasted when the nuts are split open. The dry matter content of coconut water declines as the nut matures and is a meagre source of nutrients when the nuts are harvested for copra (Göhl, 1982).
  • Other by-products of little or no feed value include the sediments recovered from the filter pads of the oil-straining presses, the coconut husks and the dust from processing the husks into fibre (coir dust), which has been suggested as a carrier for molasses (Göhl, 1982).


Coconut palms mainly grow in coastal areas of the tropics and subtropics. They require a hot moist climate with average annual temperatures between 20-28°C, average annual rainfall ranging from 1000 to 1500 mm and deep alluvial or loamy soils (Orwa et al., 2009).

Copra meal is available worldwide. In 2010, world copra production was 5.2 million tons and world copra meal production was 1.86 million tons. The main producer of copra and coconut oil is the Philippines (42% of the oil production in 2009), followed by Indonesia (25%) and India (12%). Half of the production of copra meal is sold for export and the Philippines alone exports 0.5 million tons (62.5% of its production) (FAO, 2011; Oil World, 2011; USDA, 2013). Copra meal used to be a common feed ingredient in Europe, but importations have largely decreased since the 1990s, from 950,000 t in 1992 to 15,000 in 2013 (USDA, 2013).

Environmental impact

Coconut water

Copra production yields large amounts of coconut water whose nutritive value is very low when the coconut ripens. Coconut water released in the environment may become a source of pollution and there have been attempts to use it as a substrate for growing food yeast and bacteria. It is also used as semen extender for artificial insemination (Taffin, 1993; Göhl, 1982).

Methane reduction

Coconut oil is particularly efficient to defaunate the rumen and reduce methane production. Copra meal gives comparable decreases in CH4 to refined coconut oil but decreased performance with copra meal would result in an extended finishing time, which has implications for CH4 emissions and production economics because of a longer animal lifetime (Jordan et al., 2006).

Potential constraints


The high oil content of copra meal renders it susceptible to rancidity and the product should not be used after a prolonged storage. Rancidity makes copra meal unpalatable and animals can start rejecting it even when there are no obvious signs of rancidity (Ehrlich et al., 1990). Rancidity may also cause diarrhoea (Göhl, 1982)

The wet by-product from the oil extraction of fresh coconut flesh is highly perishable. It quickly becomes rancid and develops a foul smell, and must be used as soon as possible after processing or dried in the sun or by other cheap means. Insufficient drying results in unpleasant flavour and odour that affect intake and may cause a total rejection of the diet (Aregheore, 2005).


During the sun-drying process, split coconuts are susceptible to molds and subsequent aflatoxin contamination. It mostly occurs when drying time is too short (2-3 days vs 5-7 days) or when the weather is wet (FAO/IAEA, 2001). In order to prevent mold growth, it is recommended to withdraw the coconuts that have been damaged during dehusking and to avoid contact between split coconuts and the soil as the latter it is a source of contamination. Copra meal should not contain more than 12% moisture and should be stored in a well-aerated place (FAO/IAEA, 2001). The presence of aflatoxins has been detrimental to the exportation of this product, particularly since the 1990s when the European Union tightened aflatoxin B1 regulations on dairy feed to 5 µg/kg and also reduced the limit for aflatoxin B1 in copra by-products to 20 µg/kg (FAO/IAEA, 2001).

Nutritional attributes

Copra meal is a common feed ingredient, particularly for ruminants. It contains 20-25% DM of crude protein and relatively high quantities of cell wall constituents (NDF > 50% DM, ADF about 30% DM), so that its nutritive value is inferior to that of the other major oil meals, notably soybean meal, groundnut meal and cottonseed meal. Unlike those by-products, copra meal is often obtained from mechanical extraction only and its oil content is generally quite high (about 10% DM, in the 5-15% range with values higher than 20%). The oil content makes it a valuable energy source, particularly in areas where such sources are scarce (Daghir, 2008). The less common solvent-extracted copra meal contains less oil (about 3% DM) and a little more protein (Feedipedia, 2011). 90% of the fatty acids of copra oil are saturated, which imparts it a strong resistance to oxidative rancidity (Canapi et al., 2005). Copra oil contains over 60% of medium-chain fatty acids (C8-C12), notably 46-50% of lauric acid (Gervajio, 2005).

A particularity of copra meal is its high non-starch polysaccharides content, and notably its levels of mannan and galactomannan (25-30%), which are known to have antinutritional properties in monogastric species (Sundu et al., 2009). These constituents are also the cause of the low bulk density (0.56 g/cm3 vs 0.75 for soybean meal) and high water holding capacity (4.14 g water/g feed vs 2.77 for soybean meal) of copra meal, and those physical properties tend to limit intake (Sundu et al., 2009). However, copra meal can absorb up to half its own weight of molasses, which can be a useful property in compound feed manufacturing (McDonald et al., 2002).

Copra meal is poor in essential amino acids, notably lysine and sulphur amino acids (Sundu et al., 2009). Lysine may be partly destroyed by the heating during oil extraction (Pascoal et al., 2006). Amino acid supplementation may be therefore required.


Copra meal

Copra meal is a valuable feed for ruminants and can be used as a protein supplement for grass-fed animals, either alone or in combination with other protein sources. While theoretically inferior to other common oil meals due to its lower protein content, it is often a better feed resource than other local products such as cocoa by-products or brewer’s grains (Aregheore et al., 2003). It found to be as effective as cottonseed meal for growth performance despite of having half of the protein content, and it has been advanced that the protein quality of copra meal has a higher biological value (Gulbransen et al., 1990).

Digestibility and energy values

In vivo digestibility of OM of copra meal has been measured several times, particularly in the studies comparing the in vitro, in sacco, the nutritive value of copra meal with other ingredients (Orskov et al., 1992; Chandrasekharaiah et al., 2001; Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung et al., 2002; Woods et al., 2003a; Woods et al., 2003b; Carvalho et al., 2005; Chapoutot et al., 2010). Due to the low level of lignification of its cell wall, the digestibility of NDF in copra meal is high, comparable to that of maize by-products and soybean hulls. As a consequence, in vivo OM digestibility of copra meal is good (75-85%) considering its fairly high NDF content (Woods et al., 1999; Sauvant et al., 2004; Aregheore et al., 2005). Higher values have been proposed for solvent-extracted meal than for expeller meal (85% vs 79%, Schiemann, 1981). For the expeller meal, an OMD value of 76% (12.1 MJ/kg DM) has been proposed recently (Sauvant et al., 2004).

Protein value

The fraction of rapidly fermentable N in the rumen of coconut meal is low, with values ranging from 19% (Sauvant et al., 2004), 20.1% (Kiran et al., 2007), to 22.4% (Mondal et al., 2008). Therefore, if transit is taken into account, the effective degradability of copra protein is fairly low, about 50% (Woods et al., 2003a; Woods et al., 2003b, Sauvant et al., 2004, Mondal et al., 2008). The intestinal digestibility of copra meal by-pass protein, about 90%, is rather high compared to other feed ingredients (Woods et al., 2003c; Sauvant et al., 2004; Carvalho et al., 2005; Pereira et al., 2010).


There are conflicting reports about palatability of copra meal. It was found to be very palatable and readily accepted by cattle (Gulbransen et al., 1990) but other authors observed that it decreased voluntary intake (Oliveira et al., 2010; Camacho Diaz et al., 2006). In one experiment with dairy cows, copra meal was not palatable initially and required about two weeks training to achieve satisfactory intakes, which then started to decrease (Ehrlich et al., 1990). The susceptibility of copra meal to rancidity after prolonged storage could cause such palatability issues, even when no obvious signs of rancidity are noticed (Oliveira et al., 2010; Ehrlich et al., 1990).

Dairy cows

Copra meal is a good ingredient of dairy rations and provides energy and by-pass protein. A 10% inclusion rate (Ewing, 1997) or 1.5-2 kg/d have been recommended as the maximum safe amount (Göhl, 1982) but cows have been fed more than 3 kg/d without adverse effects (Ehrlich et al., 1990). Copra meal has been shown to be a suitable supplement for cows grazing tropical pastures in Fiji and adding 1.8 kg/day of copra meal to the diet increased milk production by 70% (McIntyre, 1973). Cows grazing Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and copra meal providing 300 g/d of protein increased production by at least 1 kg/day (Muinga et al., 1993). Less impressive results have been obtained on richer pastures, but copra meal could still replace sorghum grain and increase the fat content of the milk (Ehrlich et al., 1990). Earlier research suggests that copra meal makes butterfat harder, lending it a pleasant flavour, but that large quantities of copra meal may result in tallowy butter (Göhl, 1982).

Beef cattle

Copra meal is a good supplement for grazing steers. Animals fed up to 1 kg/day of pelleted copra meal had a much higher growth rate than unsupplemented animals (0.41 vs 0.11 kg/d) (Gulbransen et al., 1990). A 10% inclusion rate has been proposed (Ewing, 1997). In growing steers grazing on giant stargrass (Cynodon plectostachyus), supplementation with copra meal gave higher growth rates than supplementation with soybean meal (Ramos et al., 1998). Steers grazing Imperata cylindrica supplemented with copra meal, alone or treated with molasses and urea also had higher growth rates (Galgal et al., 2000). Average daily gains of 0.99 kg/day and diet intake of 3.2 kg/day were recorded on grazing buffaloes fed a supplement containing 70% copra meal. While these performances were satisfactory, they were lower than those obtained with a maize/soybean meal supplement and a 70% palm kernel meal supplement, possibly due to the lower palatability of copra meal (Oliveira et al., 2010). Copra meal at a daily rate of 500 g/head, and with rumen soluble nitrogen from urea, was found to be an effective supplement for improving growth of steers fed hay made from low quality forage (Hennessy et al., 1989).

Using copra meal in growing heifers resulted in decreased performance compared to a barley-soybean meal diet supplemented with copra oil. It was as efficient in reducing CH4 production as this control diet but the environmental benefit was cancelled by a longer finishing time (Jordan et al., 2006).


Copra meal can be a suitable supplement for sheep and other ruminants consuming tropical pastures (Hammond et al., 1993; Galgal et al., 1994). Copra inclusion at 7.5% of the diet MS does not have negative effects on digestibility but decreases voluntary intake due to its poor palatability or other unknown effects (Camacho Diaz et al., 2006). Pelleted copra meal given to pregnant ewes increased birth weight of twin lambs, milk yield and ewe live weight after lambing (Bird et al., 1990). Inclusion rates of 10 and 15% for lambs and ewes respectively have been proposed (Ewing, 1997). 


Copra meal is often used as a protein supplement for grass-fed goats. Supplements containing up to 75% copra meal have been used successfully in goats fed Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) (Aregheore, 2006). Substituting 50% of copra meal with leucaena hay increased daily gain and diet digestibility (Mousoon et al., 1997), and it could be replaced by 75% of dried brewer’s grains (Aregheore et al., 2006). Copra meal could replace up to 50% of soybean meal in goats fed maize silage but 75% reduced performance (Paengkoum, 2011).

Coconut waste from the extraction of fresh coconut flesh

The by-product of oil extraction from fresh coconut flesh is a good feed for ruminants and can be used fresh or dried. It provides an acceptable and very useful protein and energy supplement (Aregheore, 2005). Based on voluntary feed intake, live weight gain and digestibility coefficients of the goats desiccated coconut waste meal based diets is interesting as a locally available feed source in ruminants nutrition in the Pacific Island countries (Aregheore et al., 2000).


Coconut orchards can be grazed when the leaves can no longer be reached by the grazing animals. It is often necessary to apply extra fertilizer to orchards that are being grazed as the coconut leaves tend to become yellow (Göhl, 1982).

Coconut water

Coconut water is sometimes fed to cattle in place of ordinary drinking water. At first it has purgative effect, but cattle soon become accustomed to it (Göhl, 1982).


Copra meal may be an economical and valuable local feed for pigs that can be used to partially replace costly imported feeds such as soybean meal (Siebra et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2001; Thorne, 1992). However, the high fibre content of copra meal restricts its use in pig feeding. The slow digestive passage rate of fibre results in decreased feed intake, lower availability of organic matter, protein, and energy in the diet and poorer growth performances (Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung et al., 2002; Noblet et al., 1993; Thorne et al., 1992; Lekule et al., 1986). Its low content in essential amino acids, combined to the depressing effect on amino acid digestibility, makes amino acid supplementation necessary (particularly lysine, methionine+cystine and threonine) if high levels of copra meal are to be fed (Han et al., 2003; Mee et al., 1973; Thorne et al., 1992).

Recommended inclusion levels vary in the literature. They range from values as low as 5% in growing-finishing pigs (and 7.5% in sows) (Ewing, 1997) to 20-25% (Pascoal et al., 2010; Siebra et al., 2009; Siebra et al., 2008; Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung et al., 2002; O'Doherty et al., 2000; Lekule et al., 1986; Lekule et al., 1982). A 10% inclusion rate yielded a gain of 500 g/d daily in growing pigs in Tanzania (Lekule et al., 1982). Inclusion rates higher than 50% depress the feed conversion ratio, but if growth performance at such rates is considered acceptable, the low cost of copra meal may decrease the cost per kg liveweight (Mael et al., 2001; Göhl, 1982).

Feeding pigs on copra meal has no deleterious effect on meat quality parameters such as fatty acids or dressing percentages (Mael et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2001). It produces firm fat in pigs (Göhl, 1982).

Literature about improving the nutritive value of copra meal for pigs is scarce The addition of an enzymatic complex failed to improve it (Pascoal et al., 2010). Expander processing of a diet containing 15% of copra meal did not affect growth performance (O'Doherty et al., 2001).


Copra meal can be a valuable raw material in poultry diets, because of its availability at relatively low cost in some contexts. The amino-acid profile is not optimal for poultry due to a relative lack of lysine and sulphur amino-acids. The energy value of copra meal is low because of the high fibre content though it can be increased by the high content of residual oil in expeller meals. In this case, the energy value can be estimated by combining the values of defatted copra meal and copra oil. There seem to be a difference between ME value for young chicks and older animals or hens (Baidya et al., 1995). The low feeding value in poultry is also partly due to physical properties of copra meal. The high water holding capacity and bulk tend to decrease intake, particularly in young animals (Sundu et al., 2005; Sundu et al., 2009). There is a significant effect of copra meal on the DM content of excreta (Panigrahi, 1989; Sundu et al., 2006). This can be a problem in some conditions for the sanitary quality of poultry litter.


Several authors have observed a decrease of performance at inclusion levels higher than 10-20% (Jacome et al., 2002; Sundu et al., 2004; Sundu et al., 2005; Sundu et al., 2006). Feed intake is lowered by low density and high water holding capacity of copra meal, and water consumption is increased (Panigrahi et al., 1987; Sundu et al., 2005). Growth depression is particularly important in young animals, in which performance can be decreased with inclusion rates as low as 5% (Bastos et al., 2007). High inclusion rates can results in a 30 to 50% drop in weight gain (Sundu et al., 2006). The effect is less strong in older animals that increase gradually their feed intake and growth performance (Panigrahi et al., 1987; Jacome et al., 2002; Sundu et al., 2005; Bastos et al., 2007). The physical presentation of copra meal has an important effect because it modifies bulk density. It seems that crumbles (coarsely ground pellets) allow better performance than fine meal (Sundu et al., 2005; Sundu et al., 2006). The use of enzymes (e.g. mannanases) to lower the effect of fibre fraction has been tested. In most studies, there is a significant improvement of animal performance with enzyme supplementation, compared to untreated copra meal. However, the performances are not equivalent to the control without copra meal (Sundu et al., 2004; Sundu et al., 2005; Sundu et al., 2008). No particular effect on the quality of carcass was noted (Jacome et al., 2002; Bastos et al., 2007).

A general recommendation for using copra meal in broiler diets is to formulate feeds carefully, taking into account a good evaluation of energy level (oil content) and the amino-acid digestibility values (risk of lysine deficiency). Spoiled or mouldy samples should be avoided because of the mycotoxin risks. For optimal performance, a limit of 10% is recommended, and no more than 5% copra meal should be allowed in the diets of young animals. Some authors are even more restrictive (3% and 2% for Daghir, 2008). Presentation as crumble / pellets should be preferred to increase feed intake. However, the incorporation levels could be higher in slow growing animals, or in contexts where the low price of copra meal allows to decrease the objective of performance.


With adequate feed formulation, copra meal can be used efficiently in layer diets. Several authors reported no performance degradation up to 20% of high fat copra meal (Panigrahi, 1989; Braga et al., 2005; Lima et al., 2007). However with defatted copra meal, a small degradation of body weight and hen day production was observed in comparison with a control of same protein and energy content, at levels above 15 to 20% (Moorthy et al., 2006b; Moorthy et al., 2010). No adverse effects were observed on egg composition (Barreto et al., 2006).

It is concluded that with adequate formulation (energy, amino acids), copra meal can be used efficiently in layer diets. In layers, it can be recommended to limit incorporation to 15%. This limit could be extended to 20% for good quality expeller copra meal. In pullet diets, it can be up to 10 to 20%.


Copra meal and coconut fibre are used in rabbit diets (Ravindran et al., 1986b; Hosein et al., 2010). Both products provide high level of fibre which is valuable for rabbits (Haponik et al., 2009). While the level and quality of protein in copra meal protein are lower than those of soybean meal, copra meal may be a valuable and economical protein source for rabbits in areas where soybean meal is expensive (Haponik et al., 2009). Copra meal is also a good source of energy for rabbits and its gross energy crude protein and oil are quite digestible (Souza et al., 2009). Copra meal can have a positive effect on rabbit meat quality: at 25% inclusion, copra meal lowers the palmitic acid content of rabbit meat without significantly affecting other fatty acids and may thus have an hypocholesterolaemic effect in humans (Souza et al., 2009).

Horses and donkeys

Copra meal is reported to have specific benefits for horses due to its low starch content, high digestible fibre and energy from the oil (Kempton, 2006).


Copra meal is a possible feed ingredient for fish though not a very good one. As a protein source, it contains much less protein than fish meal or soybean meal, and it is deficient in lysine and sulphur amino acids. While it is a good source of arginine, there is an antagonistic effect of excess dietary arginine on lysine metabolism and animals fed high dietary levels of copra meal may suffer from lysine deficiency (Tacon et al., 2009). Supplementary lysine and methionine should be provided to fish fed copra meal (Hertrampf et al., 2000). Copra meal may also contain anti-nutritional factors, including phytic acid, tannins, and non-starch polysaccharides (Tacon et al., 2009). The high crude fibre content of copra meal is disadvantageous for aquatic feeds (Hertrampf et al., 2000).

Copra meal is more valuable to herbivorous and omnivorous fishes (at 5-15% inclusion rates) rather than to carnivorous fishes (at 5-10% inclusion) (Hertrampf et al., 2000).


Recommended inclusion levels are not consistent between authors. In Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings, copra meal included in diets at levels varying from 15% to 30% resulted in similar growth performance, nutrient utilization and feed conversion ratio as control diet (Santos et al., 2009; Olude et al., 2008; Pezzato et al., 2000). Lower inclusion levels (10% copra meal in combination with 25% fish meal) had been suggested in order to be efficient and economical (Guerrero, 1980). High digestible energy (14.8 MJ/kg) and good P availability have been reported (Pezzato et al., 2000).

In male Java tilapias (Sarotherodon mossambicus), a diet containing 25% protein from copra meal supported growth as well as the control diet, but a 50% level produced lower growth rates (Jackson et al., 1982).


In grass carp fry (Ctenopharyngodon idella), which is carnivorous until it is 25-30 mm long, copra meal had a deleterious effect on feed intake and growth performance when it replaced 33% of zooplankton in the diet or when it replaced 25% protein feed in the diet (Hasan et al., 1997; Silva et al., 1981). The poor pelletability of copra meal may make it difficult to maintain particle size during feeding, thereby affecting negatively feed intake in carps (Hasan et al., 1997).

In rohu (Labeo rohita) fingerlings,& copra meal supplemented with amino acids could replace up to 50% of fish meal and thus represent more than 60% of the diet (Mukhopadhyay, 2000). A former experiment had showed that soaking defatted copra meal, in order to remove tannins, had positive effect on inclusion level of defatted copra meal (Mukhopadhyay et al., 1999).


Heuzé V., Sauvant D., Tran G., Bastianelli D., 2013. Copra meal and coconut by-products. A programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. Last updated on December 20, 2013, 23:37


Tables of chemical composition and nutritional value

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 91.5 1.5 88.5 94.8 240
Crude protein % DM 22.4 1.2 19.6 24.9 257
Crude fibre % DM 14.2 2.1 10.1 19.7 251
NDF % DM 54.7 4.8 43.9 61.7 35 *
ADF % DM 28.7 3.4 22.3 36.5 28 *
Lignin % DM 6.7 1.9 4.5 12.8 110 *
Ether extract % DM 9.8 2.7 5.2 18.4 163
Ash % DM 6.8 0.5 5.7 8.0 231
Total sugars % DM 11.4 2.4 7.8 15.8 12
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 20.1 1.5 18.8 23.8 18 *
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 1.2 0.4 0.6 2.2 56
Phosphorus g/kg DM 5.8 0.5 4.5 6.8 60
Potassium g/kg DM 20.1 1.8 17.3 23.9 27
Sodium g/kg DM 0.6 0.4 0.1 1.0 8
Magnesium g/kg DM 3.0 0.3 2.5 3.6 27
Manganese mg/kg DM 84 37 43 128 9
Zinc mg/kg DM 73 49 45 214 11
Copper mg/kg DM 33 5 26 44 12
Iron mg/kg DM 964 1019 63 2964 6
Amino acids Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Alanine % protein 4.0 0.1 3.9 4.2 4
Arginine % protein 10.7 0.9 9.4 11.3 4
Aspartic acid % protein 7.7 0.3 7.4 8.1 4
Cystine % protein 1.2 0.2 0.9 1.4 5
Glutamic acid % protein 17.8 1.6 16.6 20.2 4
Glycine % protein 4.1 0.1 4.0 4.3 4
Histidine % protein 1.9 0.1 1.8 2.1 4
Isoleucine % protein 3.0 0.1 2.9 3.2 4
Leucine % protein 5.9 0.2 5.7 6.2 5
Lysine % protein 2.6 0.2 2.3 2.9 8
Methionine % protein 1.3 0.3 1.0 1.8 5
Phenylalanine % protein 4.1 0.3 3.8 4.5 4
Proline % protein 3.4 3.4 3.4 2
Serine % protein 4.4 0.2 4.1 4.6 4
Threonine % protein 3.0 0.1 2.8 3.2 5
Tryptophan % protein 1.3 1
Tyrosine % protein 2.1 0.2 1.9 2.2 3
Valine % protein 4.7 0.3 4.3 5.1 4
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 79.7 77.0 81.0 2 *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 79.1 *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 15.9 *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 12.8 *
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 76.5 76.5 91.0 2 *
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=6%) % 49 11 26 66 13
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 55.5 9.6 55.5 85.4 5 *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 11.2 0.9 11.2 15.2 7 *
MEn growing pig MJ/kg DM 10.4 0.4 10.4 14.0 3 *
NE growing pig MJ/kg DM 7.1 *
Nitrogen digestibility, growing pig % 70.9 9.9 50.2 77.5 9 *
Poultry nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
AMEn broiler MJ/kg DM 8.7 7.5 10.0 2
Rabbit nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, rabbit % 66.1 *
DE rabbit MJ/kg DM 13.3 1
Nitrogen digestibility, rabbit % 57.7 1
MEn rabbit MJ/kg DM 12.6 *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.


AFZ, 2011; Anderson et al., 1991; Bach Knudsen, 1997; Bui Huy Nhu Phuc, 2003; Champ et al., 1989; Chapoutot et al., 1990; CIRAD, 1991; Cirad, 2008; Creswell et al., 1971; De Boever et al., 1988; De Boever et al., 1994; Fialho et al., 1995; Göhl, 1970; Gowda et al., 2004; Grillet, 1992; Holm, 1971; Jayasuriya et al., 1982; Jongbloed et al., 1990; Kuan et al., 1982; Lekule et al., 1990; Lim Han Kuo, 1967; Lindberg, 1981; Loosli et al., 1954; Madsen et al., 1984; Maertens et al., 1985; Masoero et al., 1994; Moss et al., 1994; Neumark, 1970; Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung et al., 2002; Oluyemi et al., 1976; Owusu-Domfeh et al., 1970; Rajaguru et al., 1985; Ravindran et al., 1994; Sauer et al., 1989; Smolders et al., 1990; Tamminga et al., 1990; Weisbjerg et al., 1996; Zongo et al., 1993

Last updated on 27/11/2012 16:47:43

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 89.8 1.4 86.3 91.7 18
Crude protein % DM 23.5 1.3 21.3 25.6 23
Crude fibre % DM 16.8 1.9 13.9 19.8 19
NDF % DM 56.4 6.5 44.6 65.8 9 *
ADF % DM 30.7 5.4 24.1 41.3 9 *
Lignin % DM 8.0 2.4 4.7 13.2 18 *
Ether extract % DM 2.8 1.6 0.4 5.4 16
Ash % DM 7.0 0.3 6.6 7.6 20
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 18.7 1.1 18.0 21.1 9 *
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 0.7 0.2 0.5 1.0 6
Phosphorus g/kg DM 6.5 0.5 6.1 7.3 7
Potassium g/kg DM 22.8 1.8 20.1 24.5 5
Sodium g/kg DM 0.6 1
Magnesium g/kg DM 3.3 0.2 2.9 3.5 5
Manganese mg/kg DM 62 10 51 70 4
Zinc mg/kg DM 68 15 56 89 4
Copper mg/kg DM 36 9 25 43 3
Iron mg/kg DM 1228 1704 200 3195 3
Amino acids Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Lysine % protein 2.1 1
Ruminant nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
OM digestibility, Ruminant % 78.7 3.3 69.9 78.7 3 *
Energy digestibility, ruminants % 77.2 65.8 77.2 2 *
DE ruminants MJ/kg DM 14.5 12.2 14.5 2 *
ME ruminants MJ/kg DM 11.5 *
Nitrogen digestibility, ruminants % 76.7 48.9 76.7 2 *
a (N) % 18.6 14.7 22.5 2
b (N) % 79.5 77.5 81.4 2
c (N) h-1 0.040 0.030 0.049 2
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=4%) % 58 *
Nitrogen degradability (effective, k=6%) % 50 42 70 2 *
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 52.7 *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 9.9 *
MEn growing pig MJ/kg DM 9.2 *
NE growing pig MJ/kg DM 6.3 *
Nitrogen digestibility, growing pig % 67.9 *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.


AFZ, 2011; CIRAD, 1991; Dewar, 1967; Friesecke, 1970; Grillet, 1992; Krishnamoorthy et al., 1995; Mondal et al., 2008; Nehring et al., 1963; Woods et al., 1999; Woods et al., 2003

Last updated on 27/11/2012 16:47:55

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 50.7 50.0 51.3 2
Crude protein % DM 8.6 7.4 9.7 2
Crude fibre % DM 3.7 3.0 4.3 2
Ether extract % DM 66.2 64.4 68.0 2
Ash % DM 2.5 2.0 2.9 2
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 32.1 *
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 0.3 1
Phosphorus g/kg DM 2.6 1
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 84.4 *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 27.0 *
Nitrogen digestibility, growing pig % 83.8 1

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.


Lim Han Kuo, 1967; Loosli et al., 1954

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:44:01

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 87.1 1
Crude protein % DM 2.3 1
Crude fibre % DM 34.2 1
Ether extract % DM 0.7 1
Ash % DM 7.6 1
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 17.5 *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.


Naik, 1967

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:44:01

Main analysis Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Dry matter % as fed 5.2 1
Crude protein % DM 4.4 1
Crude fibre % DM 6.5 1
Ether extract % DM 6.0 1
Ash % DM 12.3 1
Gross energy MJ/kg DM 16.9 *
Minerals Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Calcium g/kg DM 57.7 1
Phosphorus g/kg DM 38.5 1
Pig nutritive values Unit Avg SD Min Max Nb
Energy digestibility, growing pig % 79.9 *
DE growing pig MJ/kg DM 13.5 *

The asterisk * indicates that the average value was obtained by an equation.


Oyenuga, 1968

Last updated on 24/10/2012 00:44:01



Aregheore, E. M. ; Tunabuna, T., 2000. Utilization of diets containing increasing levels of dried desiccated coconut waste meal (DCWM) by growing crossbred Anglo-Nubian goats in the wet dry tropical environment of Samoa. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 9 (2)
Aregheore, E. M. ; Abdulrazak, S. A. ; Fujihara, T., 2003. Evaluation of some agri-industrial by-products available in Samoa for goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 16 (11): 1593-1598 web icon
Aregheore, E. M. ; Abdulrazak, S. A., 2005. Estimation of organic matter digestibility and metabolizable energy content of agro-industrial wastes using in vitro gas production. Nigerian J. Anim. Prod., 32 (1-2): 79-87
Aregheore, E. M. ; Viulu, S, 2006. Replacement value of copra cake (Cocos nucifera) in diets containing increasing levels of dried brewer's grains on voluntary dry matter intake and nutrient utilization of goats on a basal diet of guinea grass (Panicum maximum). Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 37 (4): 151-156 web icon
Aregheore, E. M., 2005. Feeds and forages in Pacific islands farming systems. FAO Grassland and Pasture Crops, South Pacific Special web icon
Aregheore, E. M., 2006. Utilization of concentrate supplements containing varying levels of copra cake (Cocos nucifera) by growing goats fed a basal diet of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum). Small Rumin. Res., 64 (1-2): 87-93 web icon
Baidya, N. ; Biswas, P. ; Mandal, L., 1995. Metabolizable energy value of expeller copra (Cocos nucifera) cake in layers. Indian Vet. J., 72 (7): 767-768
Barreto, S. C. S. ; Zapata, J. F. F. ; Freitas, E. R. ; Fuentes, M. F. F. ; do Nascimento, R. F. ; Moreira Araújo, R. S. R. ; Amorim, A. G. N., 2006. Yolk fatty acids and egg components from layers fed diets with coconut meal. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., 41 (12): 1767-1773 web icon
Bastos, S. C. ; Freire Fuentes, M. F. F. ; Freitas, E. R. ; Espíndola, G. B. ; Braga, C. V. De P., 2007. Efeito da inclusão do farelo de coco em rações para frangos de corte. Rev. Ciencia Agron., 38 (3): 297-303 web icon
Bird, A. R. ; Rigney, S. J. ; Stephenson, R. G. A. ; O'Sullivan, B. M, 1990. Copra meal supplementation of lambing ewes in north west Queensland. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod., 18: 456 web icon
Braga, C. V. de P. ; Freire Fuentes, M. F. ; Freitas, E. R. ; de Carvalho, L. E. ; de Sousa, F. M. ; Bastos, S. C., 2005. Effect of inclusion of coconut meal in diets for laying hens. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 34 (1): 76-80 web icon
Camacho Diaz, L. M. ; Cervantes Nunez, A. ; Pescador Salas, N. ; Cipriano Salazar, M. ; Sotelo Carachure, J. J., 2006. Effects of the inclusion of copra meal on the apparent digestibility of the dry matter in the diet of lambs pelibuey in growth. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria REDVET, 7 (10): 100632 web icon
Canapi, E. C. ; Augustin, Y. T. V. ; Moro, E. A. ; Pedrosa, E. Jr. ; Bendaño, M. L., 2005. Coconut Oil. In: Bailey's industrial oil products. 6th Edition, Volume 1 - Edible Oil and Fat Products: Chemistry, Properties, and Health Effects. Shahidi, F. (Ed). Wiley-Interscience web icon
Carvalho, L. P. F. ; Melo, D. S. P. ; Pereira, C. R. M. ; Rodrigues, M. A. M. ; Cabrita, A. R. J. ; Fonseca, A. J. M, 2005. Chemical composition, in vivo digestibility, N degradability and enzymatic intestinal digestibility of five protein supplements. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 119 (1-2): 171-178 web icon
Chandrasekharaiah, M. ; Sampath, K. T. ; Thulasi, A. ; Anandan, S., 2001. In situ protein degradability of certain feedstuffs in the rumen of cattle. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 71 (3): 261-264
Chandrasekharaiah, M. ; Sampath, K. T. ; Praveen, U. S. ; Umalatha, 2002. Evaluation of chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of certain commonly used concentrate ingredients and fodder/top feeds in ruminant rations. Indian J. Dairy Biosci., 13 (2): 28-35
Chapoutot, P. ; Dorleans, M. ; Sauvant, D., 2010. Study of degradation kinetics of cell wall components of concentrate feeds and agroindustrial by-products. Inra Prod. Anim., 23 (3): 285-304 web icon
Chapoutot, P., 1998. Étude de la dégradation in situ des constituants pariétaux des aliments pour ruminants. Thèse Docteur en Sciences Agronomiques, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, Paris (FRA), 1998/11/17.
Cheeke, P. R., 1992. Feeding systems for tropical rabbit production emphasizing roots, tubers and bananas. In: Roots, tubers, plantains and bananas in animal feeding. (Editors: Machin, D.; Nyvold, S.) Proceedings of the FAO Expert Consultation held in CIAT, Cali, Colombia FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND HEALTH PAPER 95, FAO, Roma web icon
Creswell, D. C. ; Brooks, C. C., 1971. Composition, apparent digestibility and energy evaluation of coconut oil and coconut meal. J. Anim. Sci., 33 (2): 366-369 web icon
Daghir, N. J., 2008. Poultry production in hot climates. Second Edition, Cabi Series, CABI web icon
Dairo, F. A. S. ; Fasuyi, A. O., 2008. Evaluation of fermented palm kernel meal and fermented copra meal proteins as substitute for soybean meal protein in laying hens diets. J. Central Europ. Agric., 9 (1): 35-44 web icon
Ehrensvard, U. ; Menke, K. H. ; Berschauer, F., 1983. Nutritional effects of dietary fats in rations for growing pigs. 3. Effect of sunflower and coconut kernels on deposition of protein and fat, the fatty acid pattern of back fat and some blood values in piglets. Arch. Tierernähr., 33 (12): 826-842 web icon
Ehrlich, W. K. ; Upton, P. C. ; Cowan, R. T. ; Moss, R. J., 1990. Copra meal as a supplement for grazing dairy cows. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production, 18: 196-199 web icon
Ewing, 1997. The Feeds Directory Vol 1. Commodity Products. Context Publications, Leicestershire, England. web icon
FAO, 2011. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations web icon
FAO/IAEA, 2001. Manual on the application of the HACCP system in mycotoxin prevention and control. Training and reference centre for food and pesticide control. FAO Food and Nutrition paper 73, FAO, Roma web icon
Friesecke, H. K., 1970. Final report. UNDP/SF Project No. 150 (IRQ/6)
Fuller, M. F., 2004. The encyclopedia of farm animal nutrition. CABI Publishing Series, 606 pp web icon
Galgal, K. K. ; McMeniman, N. P. ; Norton, B. W., 1994. Effect of copra expeller pellet supplementation on the flow of nutrients from the rumen of sheep fed low-quality pangola grass (Digitaria decumbens). Small Rumin. Res., 15: 31-37 web icon
Galgal, K. K. ; Komolong, M. K., 2000. Copra meal and palm kernel meal supplementation with and without molasses and urea to weaner steers grazing Imperata cylindrica pastures in Papua New Guinea. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13 (Suppl. July 2000): 261 web icon
Gervajio, G. C., 2005. Fatty acids and derivatives from coconut oil. In: Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Sixth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. web icon
Göhl, B., 1970. Animal feed from local products and by-products in the British Caribbean. Rome, FAO. AGA/Misc/70/25
Göhl, B., 1982. Les aliments du bétail sous les tropiques. FAO, Division de Production et Santé Animale, Roma, Italy web icon
Grimwood, B. E. ; Ashman, F. ; Jarman, C. G. ; Collab Little, E. C. S. ; Dendy, D. A. V., 1976. Coconut palm products: their processing in developing countries. Plant Production and Protection Papers, 7, FAO, Roma web icon
Guarte, R.C. ; Mühlbauer, W. ; Kellert, M., 1996. Drying characteristics of copra and quality of copra and coconut oil. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 9 (3): 361-372 web icon
Guerrero III, R. D., 1980. Studies on the feeding of tilapia nilotica in floating cages. Aquaculture, 20: 169-175 web icon
Gulbransen, B. ; Standfast, N. F. ; Kempton, T. J., 1990. Supplementation of grazing steers with copra meal. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod., 18: 236-239 web icon
Hammond, A. C. ; Wildeus, S., 1993. Effects of coconut meal or fish meal supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and diet digestibility in growing St. Croix lambs fed a tropical grass-based diet. Small Rumin. Res., 12 (1): 13-25 web icon
Han, Y. K. ; Kim, I. H. ; Hong, J. W. ; Kwon, O. S. ; Lee, S. H. ; Kim, J. H. ; Min, B. J. ; Lee, W. B., 2003. Apparent ileal digestibility of nutrient in plant protein feedstuffs for finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 16 (7): 1020-1024 web icon
Haponik, C. A. V. de; Espindola, G. B. ; Freitas, E. R. ; Raquel, D. L. ; Ramos, L. de O. ; Chaves, C. de S., 2009. Nutritional evaluation of diets containing coconut bran supplied to slaughter rabbits. Acta Scientiarum - Animal Sciences, 31 (4): 357-364 web icon
Hasan, M. R. ; Macintosh, D. J. ; Jaunceyn, K., 1997. Evaluation of some plant ingredients as dietary protein sources for common carp (Cyprinus carpio L) fry. Aquaculture, 151 (1-4): 55-70 web icon
Hennessy, D. W.; Kempton, T. J.; Williamson, P. J., 1989. Copra meal as a supplement to cattle offered a low quality native pasture hay. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 2 (2): 77-84
Hertrampf, J. W. ; Piedad-Pascual, F., 2000. Handbook on ingredients for aquaculture feeds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 624 pp. web icon
Hosein, A. F. ; Rastogi, R. K., 2010. Growth, feed conversion and carcass traits study in rabbits, Trinidad, West Indies. CARDI Review, 9: 14-21 web icon
IndexMundi, 2010. Agricultural production, supply, and distribution charts. IndexMundi web icon
Jackson, A. J., Capper, B. S.; Matty, A. J. , 1982. Evaluation of some plant proteins in complete diets for the tilapia Sarotherodon mossambicus. Aquaculture, 27: 97-109 web icon
Jácome, I. M. T. D. ; Gomes da Silva, L. P. ; Guim, A. ; Lima, D. Q. ; Almeida, M. M. ; de Araújo, M. J. ; Oliveira, V. P. ; Silva, J. D. B. ; Martins, T. D. D., 2002. Effect of different levels of coconut meal in broiler chicken's diets upon the carcass yield. Acta Scient. Anim. Sci., 24 (4): 1015-1019 web icon
Jordan, E. ; Lovett, D. K. ; Monahan, F. J. ; Callan, J. ; Flynn, B. ; O'Mara, F. P., 2006. Effect of refined coconut oil or copra meal on methane output and on intake and performance of beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci., 84 (1): 162-170 web icon
Kempton, T. J., 2006. Value-added coconut co-products. In: Adkins, S.W., Foale, M. and Samosir, Y.M.S. (eds) 2006. Coconut revival—new possibilities for the 'tree of life’. Proc. Int. Coconut Forum, Cairns, Australia, 22–24 November 2005. ACIAR Proceedings No. 125 web icon
Kim, B. G. ; Lee, J. H. ; Jung, H. J. ; Han, Y. K. ; Park, K. M. ; Han, I. K., 2001. Effect of partial replacement of soybean meal with palm kernel meal and copra meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass characteristics of finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 14 (6): 821-830 web icon
Kiran, D. ; Krishnamoorthy, U., 2007. Rumen fermentation kinetics and nitrogen degradability of commonly used ruminant feedstuffs in vitro. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol., 7 (1): 63-71 web icon
Kurian, A. ; Peter, K. V., 2007. Commercial crops technology: Vol 8. Horticulture Science Series. New India Publishing web icon
Lekule, F. P. ; Homb, T. ; Katagile, J. A., 1982. Optimum inclusion of coconut meal in growing finishing pig diets. E. Afr. Agric. For. J., 48 (1/4): 19-24
Lekule, F. P. ; Homb, T. ; Kategile, J. A., 1986. Digestibility and effect of copra cake on rate of gain, feed efficiency and protein retention of fattening pigs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 18 (4): 243-247 web icon
Lennerts, L., 1988. Coconut cake/expeller and coconut oilmeal: two valuable ingredients for cattle feed mixtures. Muhle + Mischfuttertechnik, 125 (3): 23-24
Lin, K. O. ; Zainal, Z. A. ; Quadir, G. A. ; Abdullah, M. Z., 2000. Plant based energy potential and biomass utilization in Malaysia. Int. Energy J., 1 (2): 77-88 web icon
Lim Han Kuo, 1967. Animal feeding stuffs. Part 3. Compositional data of feeds and concentrates. Malay. Agric. J., 46 (1): 63-79
Lima, R. C. ; Fuentes, M. F. F. ; Freitas, E. R. ; Sucupira, F. S. ; Moreira, R. F. ; Braz, N. M., 2007. Coconut meal in laying hens diets: nutrients digestibility, performance and egg quality. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 36 (5): 1340-1346 web icon
Loosli, J. K. ; Pena, J. O. ; Ynalvez, L. A. ; Villegas, V., 1954. The digestibility by swine of rice bran, copra meal, coconut meal, coconut residue and two concentrate mixtures. The Philippine Agriculturist, 38: 191-195 web icon
Mael, S. H. ; Ajuyah, A. O., 2001. Response of pigs fed a high level of copra meal based grower diet fortified with exogenous enzyme. J. South Pacific Agriculture, 8 (1): 1-5
McDonald, P. ; Edwards, R. A. ; Greenhalgh, J. F. D., 2002. Animal Nutrition. 6th Edition. Longman, London and New York. 543 pp web icon
McIntyre, K. H., 1973. Use of coconut meal and molasses as supplements to grazing for dairy cows in Fiji. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad), 50 (1): 17-23
Mee, J. M. L. ; Brooks, C. C., 1973. Amino acid availability of coconut meal protein in swine. Nutrition Reports International, 8 (4): 261-269
Mondal, G. ; Walli, T. K. ; Patra, A. K., 2008. In vitro and in sacco ruminal protein degradability of common Indian feed ingredients. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 20 (4): 63 web icon
Moorthy, M. ; Viswanathan, K. ; Edwin, S. C., 2006. Ileal digestibility and metabolizable energy of extracted coconut meal in poultry. Ind. Vet. J., 83 (5): 575-576
Moorthy, M. ; Viswanathan, K., 2006. Feeding Value of Extracted Coconut Meal for White Leghorn Layers. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5 (11): 1040-1045 web icon
Moorthy, M. ; Viswanathan, K., 2009. Nutritive value of extracted coconut (Cocos nucifera) meal. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5 (4): 515-517 web icon
Moorthy, M. ; Viswanathan, K., 2010. Digestibility and feeding value of coconut meal for white leghorn layers. Tamilnadu J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 6 (5): 196-203 web icon
Mousoon, M. M. ; Perera, A. N. F. ; Perera, E. R. K., 1997. Feeding value of different levels of leucaena hay and coconut oil meal as a supplementary feed for goats. Trop. Agric. Res., 9: 236-244 web icon
Muinga, R. W. ; Thorpe, W. ; Topps, J. H., 1993. Lactational performance of Jersey cows given Napier fodder (Pennisetum purpureum) with and without protein concentrates in the semi-humid tropics. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 25 (2): 118-128 web icon
Mukhopadhyay, N. ; Ray, A., 1999. Utilization of copra meal in the formulation of compound diets for rohu Labeo rohita fingerlings. J. Appl. Ichth., 15: 127- 131 web icon
Mukhopadhyay, N., 2000. Improvement of quality of copra (dried kernel of Cocos nucifera) seed meal protein with supplemental aminoacids in feed for rohu (Labeo rohita (Hamilton)) fingerlings. Acta Ichthyol. Fiscal., 30 (2): 21-34 web icon
Naik, A. H., 1967. Chemical composition of Tanzania feedingstuffs. E. Afr. Agric. For. J., 32 (2): 201-205
Neumark, H., 1970. Personal communication. Volcani Institute of Agricutural Reseach, Israel
Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung; Luu Huu Manh; Udén, P., 2002. Tropical fibre sources for pigs - digestibility, digesta retention and estimation of fibre digestibility in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 102 (1-4): 109–124 web icon
Noblet, J. ; Perez, J. M., 1993. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical composition. J. Anim. Sci., 71: 3389-3398 web icon
O’Doherty, J. V. ; McKeon, M. P., 2000. The use of expeller copra meal in grower and finisher pig diets. Livest. Prod. Sci., 67 (1-2): 55-65 web icon
O'Doherty, J. V. ; Murphy, D. ; McGlynn, S. G., 2001. The effects of expander processing and by-product inclusion levels on performance of grower-finisher pigs. Anim. Sci., 73 (3): 479-487 web icon
Oil World, 2011. Major meals, World summary balances. Oil World Weekly, February 28, 2011, 54 (8): 95-104
Oliveira, K. C. C. ; Faturi, C. ; Garcia, A. R. ; Nahúm, B. S. ; Lourenço Júnior, J. B. ; Joele, M. R. S. P., 2010. Supplemental feeding for buffaloes with agroindustry by-products on silvopastoral system in Brazilian eastern Amazon. Revista Veterinaria, 21 (Suppl. 1): 802-804 web icon
Olude, O. O. ; Alegbeleye, W. O. A. ; Obasa, S. O., 2008. The use of soaked copra meal as a partial substitute for soybean meal in the diet of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 20 (10): 169 web icon
Ørskov, E. R. ; Nakashima, Y. ; Abreu, J. M. F. ; Kibon, A. ; Tuah, A. K., 1992. Data on DM degradability of feedstuffs. Studies at and in association with the Rowett Research Organization, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, UK. Personal Communication
Orwa, C. ; Mutua, A. ; Kindt, R. ; Jamnadass, R. ; Anthony, S., 2009. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya web icon
Owusu-Domfeh, K. ; Christensen, D. A. ; Owen, B. D., 1970. Nutritive value of some Ghanaian feedstuffs. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 50: 1-14 web icon
Oyenuga, V. A., 1968. Nigeria's foods and foodstuffs. Ibadan, University Press
Paengkoum, P., 2011. Utilization of concentrate supplements containing varying levels of coconut meal by Thai native Anglo-Nubian goats. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 23 (2) web icon
Panditharatne, S. ; Allen, V. G. ; Fontenot, J. P. ; Jayasuriya, M. C. N., 1986. Ensiling characteristics of tropical grasses as influenced by stage of growth, additives and chopping length. J. Anim. Sci., 63 (1): 197-207 web icon
Panigrahi, S. ; Machin, D. H. ; Parr, W. H. ; Bainton, J., 1987. Responses of broiler chicks to dietary copra cake of high lipid content. Br. Poult. Sci., 28 (4): 589-600 web icon
Panigrahi, S., 1989. Effects on egg production of including high residual lipid copra meal in laying hen diets. Br. Poult. Sci., 30 (2): 305-312 web icon
Pascoal, L. A. F. ; Miranda, E. M. de; Silva, L. P. G. da; Dourado, L. R. B. ; Bezerra, A. P. A., 2006. Nutritive value of copra meal in diets for monogastric animals. Nutritime, 3 (1): 305-312 web icon
Pascoal, L. A. F. ; Miranda, E. C. de; Lamenha, M. I. A. ; Watanabe, P. H. ; Miranda, C. C. de; Silva, L. da P. G. da; Araujo, D. de M., 2010. Inclusion of coconut meal in diets for growing pigs with or without enzimatic supplementation. Rev. Bras. Saude Prod. Anim., 11 (1): 160-169 web icon
Pereira, E. S. ; Pimentel, P. G. ; Duarte, L. S. ; Villarroel, A. B. S. ; Regadas Filho, J. G. L. ; Rocha Junior, J. N., 2010. Intestinal digestibility of protein of adapted forages and by-products in Brazilian Northeast by three-steps technique. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim., 11 (2): 403-413 web icon
Pezzato, L. E. ; Miranda, E. C. ; Barros, M. M. ; Pinto, L. G. Q. ; Pezzato, A. ; Furuyan W. M., 2000. Nutritive value of coconut meal for the Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Acta Scientiarum, Maringá, 22 (3): 695-699
Ramli, A. S. ; Mohamad, B., 1982. The integration of cattle with coconut cultivation. 1. Growth performance and production systems. MARDI Research Bulletin, 10 (3): 384-392
Ramos, J. A. ; Mendoza, G. D. ; Aranda, E. ; Garcia-Bojalil, C. ; Barcena, R. ; Alanis, J., 1998. Escape protein supplementation of growing steers grazing stargrass. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 70 (3): 249-256 web icon
Ravindran, V. ; Sriskandarjah, N. ; Rajaguru, A. S. B, 1984. The utilization of coconut sap distillery by products by broiler chicks. Agricultural Wastes, 11 (2): 115-124 web icon
Ravindran, V. ; Kornegay, E. T. ; Rajaguru, A. S. B. ; Potter, L. M. ; Cherry, J. A., 1986. Cassava leaf meal as a replacement for coconut oil meal in broiler diets. Poult. Sci., 65 (9): 1720-1727
Ravindran, V. ; Rajadevan, P. ; Goonewardene, L. A. ; Rajaguru, A. S. B., 1986. Effects of feeding cassava leaf meal on the growth of rabbits. Agricultural Wastes, 17 (3) web icon
Ravindran, V. ; Kornegay, E. T. ; Rajaguru, A. S. B. ; Notter, D. R., 1987. Cassava leaf meal as a replacement for coconut oil meal in pig diet. J. Sci. Food Agric., 41 (1): 45-53
Reynolds, S. G., 1995. Pasture-cattle-coconut systems. FAO web icon
Ribier, D. ; Rouzière A., 1995. Artisanal processing of oil plants. GRET, 104 p. web icon
Sampath, K. T. ; Sivaraman, E., 1985. In situ dry matter disappearance and protein degradability of certain cakes in the rumen of cattle. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 2 (4): 141-148
Santos, E. L. ; Ludke, M. do C. M. M. ; Barbosa, J. M. ; Rabello, C. B. V. ; Ludke, J. V. ; Winterle, W. de M. C. ; Silva, E. G. da, 2009. Coconut meal levels in ration for fingerling Nile tilapia. Rev. Bras. Saude Prod. Anim., 10 (2): 390-397 web icon
Sauvant, D. ; Perez, J. M. ; Tran, G., 2004. Tables INRA-AFZ de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d'élevage: 2ème édition. ISBN 2738011586, 306 p. INRA Editions Versailles web icon
Schiemann, R., 1981. Stoff- und Energieeumsatz beim ausgewachsenen, vorwiegend fettbildenden Tier. In: Gebhardt, G. (ed.): Tierernährung. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin, 96-106.
Scott, M. L., 1967. Personal communication. Department of Poultry Science, Cornell University
Siebra, J. E. da C. ; Ludke, M. do C. M. M. ; Ludke, J. V. ; Bertol, T. M. ; Dutra Junior, W. M., 2008. Bioeconomic performance of growing-finishing pigs fed diet with coconut meal. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 37 (11): 1996-2002 web icon
Siebra, J. E. da C. ; Ludke, M. do C. M. M. ; Ludke, J. V. ; Bertol, T. M. ; Dutra Junior, W. M., 2009. Use of coconut meal in slaughter pig diets. Rev. Bras. Saude Prod. Anim., 10 (3): 604-614 web icon
Silva, S. S. ; Weerakon, D. E. M., 1981. Growth, food intake and evacuation rates of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquaculture, 25 (1): 67-76 web icon
Silva, R. B. ; Freitas, E. R. ; Fuentes, M. F. F. ; Lopes, I. R. V. ; Lima, R. C. ; Bezerra, R. M., 2008. Chemical composition and values of metabolizable energy of alternative feedstuffs determined with different birds. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci., 30 (3): 269-275 web icon
Souza, D. V. de; Zapata, J. F. F. ; Freitas, E. R. ; Souza Neto, M. A. ; Pereira, A. L. F. ; Vidal, T. F. ; Abreu, V. K. G. ; Silva, E. M. C. da, 2009. Fatty acid profile and proximal composition of meat from rabbits fed diets containing coconut meal. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 29 (4): 778-784 web icon
Sudhamayee, K. G. ; Swathi, B. ; Reddy, J. M. ; Reddy, K. J., 2004. Effect of different protein supplements on nutrient utilization in sheep. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 21 (1): 34-35
Sudhamayee, K. G. ; Swathi, B., 2005. Effect of different protein supplements on microbial nitrogen synthesis in sheep. Indian Vet. J., 82 (10): 1066-1068
Sundu, B. ; Kumar, A. ; Dingle, J., 2004. The effect of levels of copra meal and enzymes on bird performance. Proceedings of the 16th Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 9-11 february 2004. 52-54 web icon
Sundu, B. ; Kumar, A. ; Dingle, J., 2005. Growth pattern of broilers fed a physically of enzymatically treated copra meal diet. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 7-9 February 2005. 291-294 web icon
Sundu, D. ; Kumar, A. ; Dingle, J., 2006. Response of broiler chicks fed increasing levels of copra meal and enzymes. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5 (1): 13-18 web icon
Sundu, B. ; Kumar, A. ; Dingle, J., 2008. The Effect of Proportion of Crumbled Copra Meal and Enzyme Supplementation on Broiler Growth and Gastrointestinal Development. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 7 (5): 511-515 web icon
Sundu, B. ; Kumar, A. ; Dingle, J., 2009. Feeding value of copra meal for broilers. World Poult. Sci. J., 65 (3):481-491 web icon
Tacon, A. G. J. ; Metian, M. ; Hasan, M. R., 2009. Feed ingredients and fertilizers for farmed aquatic animals. Sources and composition. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture technical paper, 540. FAO, Roma, Italy web icon
Taffin, G. de; Dollet, M. ; Louise, C. ; Mariau, D. ; Renard, J. L. ; Rouzière, A. ; Wuidart, W., 1993. Le cocotier. Le Technicien d'agriculture tropicale, Maisonneuve et Larose - ACCT web icon
Thorne, P. J. ; Wiseman, J. ; Cole, D. J. A. ; Machin, D. H., 1992. Amino acid composition and aspects of protein quality in expeller copra meals for pig feeding. Tropical Science, 32 (2): 145-151
Thorne, P. J., 1992. Alternatives to imported compound feeds for growing pigs in Solomon Islands. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad), 69 (2): 141-144 web icon
TIS, 2013. Copra expeller. Transport Information Service from German Marine Insurers web icon
TIS, 2013. Copra extraction meal. Transport Information Service from German Marine Insurers web icon
USDA, 2013. Downloadable data sets. Foreign Agricultural Service. PSD Online web icon
Viswanathan, T. V., 1980. A short note on the chemical composition of coconut pith. Kerala J. Vet. Sci., 11 (1): 174 web icon
Woods, V. B. ; Moloney, A. P. ; Mulligan, F. J. ; Kenny, M. J. ; O'Mara, F. P., 1999. The effect of animal species (cattle or sheep) and level of intake by cattle on in vivo digestibility of concentrate ingredients. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 80 (2): 135-150 web icon
Woods, V. B. ; O'Mara, F. P. ; Moloney, A. P, 2003. The nutritive value of concentrate feedstuffs for ruminant animals. Part I: In situ ruminal degradability of dry matter and organic matter. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 110 (1/4): 111-130 web icon
Woods, V. B. ; Moloney, A. P. ; O'Mara, F. P., 2003. The nutritive value of concentrate feedstuffs for ruminant animals. Part II: In situ ruminal degradability of crude protein. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 110 (1/4): 131-143 web icon
Woods, V. B. ; Moloney, A. P. ; Calsamiglia, S. ; O'Mara, F. P., 2003. The nutritive value of concentrate feedstuffs for ruminant animals. Part III. Small intestinal digestibility as measured by in vitro or mobile bag techniques. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 110 (1/4): 145-157 web icon